Cleveland Indians to become the Guardians

The Burdened

Registered User
May 1, 2017
3,196
4,209
I don't mind the name, honestly.
I'm fine with the wordmark; althought I don't care for the stand alone "C" it looks vanilla.

the logo looks like a dollar store version of the old Anaheim Angels logo from the 90's
 

Blitzkrug

Registered User
Sep 17, 2013
25,785
7,634
Winnipeg
Not awful. Smart to make the word logo and new letter resemble the older versions.

Feel like they could have done better tho
 

Dr Pepper

Registered User
Dec 9, 2005
70,717
15,994
Sunny Etobicoke
Oddly enough, I have the exact opposite reaction. I don't care for the name (it's clearly an attempt to change as little as possible; the entire "dians" section of the wordmark is exactly the same), but the Winged G logo isn't bad. Someone pointed out that the Gs are positioned like a curveball grip, and while the positioning looks more like a splitter or forkball to me, that came across as pretty cool. I just wish they'd have gone back into Cleveland baseball history more, and gone with Spiders, Blues, or Naps. (I'm a fan of naming teams for famous players; I want Atlanta to consider renaming the team the Hammers, too.)

It looks......clipart-ish, or something you'd see designed in MS Paint.

Not fitting of a major league team, IMO.

But maybe it'll grow on me over time, who knows.
 

DougieSmash

WE'RE IN! WE'RE IN! YES! YES! WOO!
Jan 2, 2009
14,795
15,968
Cartoonish logo... I like it but doesn't exactly scream MLB.

Lame name. Not a fan of Spiders but much better for sure.
 

Troy McClure

Suter will never be scratched
Mar 12, 2002
47,876
15,738
South of Heaven
They are also playing up the statues you see on the bridge that takes you across the Cuyahoga River to the ballpark.

7a309046f921b9ebf42cd72c03c2ca05.jpg
 

Richard

Registered User
Feb 8, 2012
2,902
2,023
It was past time to make the change, but Guardians is a bit cringe. They left a lot of better names on the table.
Why was it past time to make the change? It's utterly stupid.

Redskins was grossly offensive.

Indians? Come on. It's utterly ridiculous.

Better change the Fighting Irish, Highlanders, Vikings, Celtics, Knicks, Yankees, Canucks, Canadiens, etc....

Gotta change em all now. No ethnicity allowed.

Bunch of sweet shit this nonsense has become
 

TheTotalPackage

Registered User
Sep 14, 2006
7,428
5,644
There was probably a high paid focus group that spent endless hours deliberating over names and somehow thought it was a good idea to come up with this.
 

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
85,336
139,111
Bojangles Parking Lot
Why was it past time to make the change? It's utterly stupid.

Redskins was grossly offensive.

Indians? Come on. It's utterly ridiculous.

Better change the Fighting Irish, Highlanders, Vikings, Celtics, Knicks, Yankees, Canucks, Canadiens, etc....

Gotta change em all now. No ethnicity allowed.

Bunch of sweet shit this nonsense has become

Their mascot was ****ing Chief Wahoo.

There’s no way you can walk that back to “we’re trying to honor your culture”. It was blatant racial caricature. Come on now.
 

Richard

Registered User
Feb 8, 2012
2,902
2,023
Their mascot was ****ing Chief Wahoo.

There’s no way you can walk that back to “we’re trying to honor your culture”. It was blatant racial caricature. Come on now.
And they got rid of it. Ta - da problem solved.

Also this logo needs removed:

thumb.aspx



and this one:

44b3bd38-32f1-11ea-bd3e-0a329c134846-LOGOBHS.jpg


And this one:

Minnesota-Vikings-team-logo.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: John Price

Pink Mist

RIP MM*
Jan 11, 2009
6,740
4,832
Toronto
Name is inoffensive so already better than their former name, but surely they could have picked something a lot better than Guardians.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kihei

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad