King Forsberg
16 21 28 44 68 88 93
- Jul 26, 2010
- 6,192
- 59
His playoff performance was exactly what you'd expect if you actually look at the situation he was in. The guy is getting nearly molested by Rangers players every time he touches the ice,
I agreed but I also saw him pass when he had a clear shot at the net, miss open nets and have a lot of trouble handling the puck.
When I turn on 97.5 the fanatic and hear hosts spouting off that Giroux underperformed and that he's not a true star, needs to be the #2 player, etc. and then see that some people on this website agree, I wonder if this city truly deserves the greatness that is Giroux.
Around the league, leaders and high level players are getting their goals and MEANINGFUL points and CONTRIBUTING shift after shift. Upsets do happen in this league and the underdog can and does have a better day. With G, all we hear are excuses. Are the rest of the leaders and high level players playing against AHLers on their shifts? Other teams game plan around certain players too, yet everyone but our guy is able to get it done. G isn't the only guy getting "special attention" in the league..
They should trade him for Crosby since he only has one goal in the playoffs.
A bum for another bum
No, that's not a fact. He did played well, as exhibited both by his stats and by an eye test, if you actually watched the games.He didn't play well, and that's a fact. It doesn't make him a bum. He just plain didn't play well.
But this is the kind of thing superstars fight their way through. It is fair to say they Giroux didn't get it done versus Rangers.
No, that's not a fact. He did played well, as exhibited both by his stats and by an eye test, if you actually watched the games.
What would be playing well be for you then? 2 PPG and a +/- 10?
Guys, I just noticed something. If you ignore every goal and assist Giroux has racked up in his career, the guy technically hasn't done ANYTHING.
We better trade him for a 7th. Probably have to include our first rounder too.
Team lost. Obviously it's Giroux's fault.
Team lost. Obviously it's Giroux's fault.
well Lavvy is no longer the coach.
the usual suspects cant blame him. instead blame the captain.
It appears to me that he does not have the combination required to truly lift a team when they need him most. Not big enough, not fast enough, not a good enough shot, the combos that make players truly great - I don't think they are there.
He can be criticized without being called a bum, I think.
We're talking about the same guy, right? This Giroux kid who scored an overtime goal to sink Chicago in game 3 of the '10 Finals in his first full year in the NHL.
This Giroux kid who followed that up with a couple of outstanding goals in the Flyers' 7-game nail biter against Buffalo in '11.
This Giroux kid who was absolutely dominant and the best player on the ice against Pittsburgh in the Flyers' 6-game series win.
This Giroux kid who, despite getting very limited help from anyone but Voracek, managed to go PPG against the Rangers this season.
Seriously, anyone blaming Giroux for losing this series has no brain.
What would be playing well be for you then? 2 PPG and a +/- 10?
It's hard to claim that Giroux's play in the Rangers series was as good as it was during the regular season. He may have gotten points, but he didn't seem to influence the game like he normally does. I wouldn't use the word invisible, but I would say he was managed.
Ehh, you can't deny he didn't really have a great series. He certainly wasn't the biggest reason we lost, but he could have been better. Missing that open net in Game 7 is haunting.
Seriously, anyone blaming Giroux for losing this series has no brain.