deadhead
Registered User
- Feb 26, 2014
- 49,215
- 21,617
I'm just happy he's with Couts for the long run, I think it'll extend his peak years by 2-3 years.
They could have gone with Giroux and Voracek and Filppula and Couts, but we've seen G & V struggle together the last few years.
They're both pass first forwards, and neither is really focused on defense. Raffl worked well with them at times, but I'm not sure Weal would be a good fit, and Lindblom as a rookie was probably not optimal either (in 2-3 years that might be a different matter).
I think Couts was the key because of his ability to handle physical centers and his on ice instincts which allows Giroux to gamble a bit more and make plays. And Couts has developed as a shooter, which gives Giroux a better option. Notice Konecny doing just as well as Voracek on their right, and even Simmonds played well with them.
They could have gone with Giroux and Voracek and Filppula and Couts, but we've seen G & V struggle together the last few years.
They're both pass first forwards, and neither is really focused on defense. Raffl worked well with them at times, but I'm not sure Weal would be a good fit, and Lindblom as a rookie was probably not optimal either (in 2-3 years that might be a different matter).
I think Couts was the key because of his ability to handle physical centers and his on ice instincts which allows Giroux to gamble a bit more and make plays. And Couts has developed as a shooter, which gives Giroux a better option. Notice Konecny doing just as well as Voracek on their right, and even Simmonds played well with them.