Or he was overrated to begin with?
I still think he is a decent player. Probably in the same category as Pulisic.Ross Barkley isn't a good for a top 6 team.
Or he was overrated to begin with?
I still think he is a decent player. Probably in the same category as Pulisic.Ross Barkley isn't a good for a top 6 team.
But not good enough to make bench? It's same thing as Pulisic. Both are bench level players or starters for Everton.Everyone definitely underrated Chelsea's youth players, but Barkley isn't good enough for Chelsea in my opinion. I can't see him playing much when RLC and Kante are both 100% fit.
I still think he is a decent player. Probably in the same category as Pulisic.
I still think he is a decent player. Probably in the same category as Pulisic.
Barkley started on Saturday, and Kante and James were back healthy today. They had a goalie, 2 wingers, a midfielder, a defender, and 2 strikers on the bench today.But not good enough to make bench? It's same thing as Pulisic. Both are bench level players or starters for Everton.
Barkley is such a frustrating player. His movement off the ball is really good which often leaves him open for a quick pass, but he makes terrible decisions with the ball when he tries to do anything but make a safe pass.Pulisic should end up the better player of those two, pretty easily imo. Barkley's IQ really holds him back, as he does have some decent raw tools.
Barkley at 20 was goodBarkley is 25 and likely not growing too much more. Solid depth player in a top 6 side ,.nothing more though.
Pulisic still has time to grow to his ceiling.
Barkley at 20 was good
Is Juve still appealing against one of the titles Inter won a long time ago?
Is this thread going into a "Arsenal vs Tottenham" type thread?
Nope just a Pulisic thread at this point.
I think we need to take this for what it is. The person would rather see Chelsea finish 6th or 7th with Pulisic playing every week than see them finish 3rd or 4th with Pulisic playing about the same as he was at Dortmund and maybe even less. Honestly, so would I, but that's because I hate Chelsea. The reality is that this isn't a video game and nobody in the real world would do that. The FIFA thread where you make a club team with all the Americans playing every game is over that way.
Also, it's getting to the point where I wish we wasted money on Pulisic instead so that I could read this about Mane being picked over him. The whining is delicious. He would barely ever play at the best teams in the league. Probably less than Origi tbh.
It's still early days anyway. He needs to improve from that performance against Sheffield United. He barely looked like a Premier League player there and needs to be far more aggressive. He has been tentative by any real standard a person could use, but he's also not playing and Chelsea won...so it is irrelevant to this thread. The results matter far more than his performance level. It's an absolute fact that Chelsea played **** with him in the team and won games when he wasn't in the team.
Now that being said, he saved our **** with that late winning goal after the team had completely **** the bed. Was a great run and nice finish.
Also the narrative that Liverpool beating Spurs in the final isn't impressive is a little strange. Tottenham/Ajax had to come through Real Madrid, Manchester City and Juventus. Liverpool snuffed out Tottenham in the final and completely stifled them but they were no less worthy than other teams in the past of being there based on their run and performances in the CL. At that point domestic form really doesn't matter.
I'm also not sold on this Bayern team being much better than last season. They were a strong team last season and are a strong team this season. Coutinho is talented but I doubt that he makes a difference in the really tough games against the top teams. Tolisso didn't impress me and Neuer looks far from the best keeper in the world he once was. I think 7-2 is a bit flattering to Bayern even in that game, tbh.
Savage from Martinez, though Gnabry did get it back.
Also the narrative that Liverpool beating Spurs in the final isn't impressive is a little strange. Tottenham/Ajax had to come through Real Madrid, Manchester City and Juventus. Liverpool snuffed out Tottenham in the final and completely stifled them but they were no less worthy than other teams in the past of being there based on their run and performances in the CL. At that point domestic form really doesn't matter.
I'm also not sold on this Bayern team being much better than last season. They were a strong team last season and are a strong team this season. Coutinho is talented but I doubt that he makes a difference in the really tough games against the top teams. Tolisso didn't impress me and Neuer looks far from the best keeper in the world he once was. I think 7-2 is a bit flattering to Bayern even in that game, tbh.
Dembele is highly unprofessional and is always injured.
Goetze is in the final year of his contract and refuses to take a pay cut.
In both those situations, there are non-sporting reasons keeping them from more playing time.
What’s the non-sporting reason keeping Pulisic from playing? All I’ve heard with the excuses for Lampard is that it’s sporting.
So, I agree 100%, they are as worthy CL winners as any other team. And in 3 or 5 years time, noone will be mentioning that the final was dull anyway.
Some of you Canadians are very jealous that we have a proven good player at the top level before you guys do. I saw another Canadian who is one of the biggest haters @Pouchkine repped your post. He regularly insults MLS and American players. You guys give Canadian fans a bad name because most of the Canadians who post here aren't haters. You don't see any of us criticizing Davies, David or any of your players, yet a lot of you pour a lot of hate into Pulisic anytime he's mentioned. If this section is going to be shared by Canadians and Americans, you should stop hating on our players for no reason. It'd be very easy for us to hate on Canadian soccer, but we don't do that.
What an argument. The chip on your shoulder gets bigger every post. Have you even noticed that it's people of every single nationality weighing in against you? Personally I've never in my life watched Pulisic play and have no opinion on him whatsoever, but this argument is only really fun to watch if the paragraph count sticks to like 0.5.
(p.s. pouchkine consistently disses every single player and league and though he may reside in canada, his posting profile clearly screams russian)
I'm USMNT fan.If you aren't jealous, you wouldn't mention you prefer a Canadian player in the same paragraph you made sure to clarify that weren't jealous.
And besides, who are these Americans I'm arguing against? The guy that says he hates international football and a bunch of Chelsea fans? Have you encountered the average educated USMNT fan and know what their opinion is of Pulisic? I'm not blaming you or any of these people either who are ignorant when it comes to opinions of Pulisic. But at the same time I find it bizarre how some claim I have homerism. This is a pretty basic discussion about Pulisic with people who for the most part don't have much knowledge about the player. I have never considered myself to be particularly high on Pulisic. If someone is ignorant, why would they try to psychoanalyze what someone else thinks. Thats not necessarily directed towards you, more the people who think its a good argument to call me biased.
I have literally done this in the past... buy only Argentinean players. Won the champions league and EPL with River plate lol. It's a blast.
In FIFA 13(?), I turned Barnet into a global superpower using primarily New Zealand footballersI put TFC in the Championship with just Canadian players... The climb to the top was a slow one.
What's the fun in that?Pshh, I play as the super-clubs, sign a bunch of stars to pre-contracts in January, win everything, and then start completely over after 2 seasons after I get bored out of my mind.
Global domination from start to finish.What's the fun in that?