Well, now everyone *****ing that Megna and Gibbons will never got shots on the third line can shut up.
Well, now everyone *****ing that Megna and Gibbons will never got shots on the third line can shut up.
why? This is to make room for Chris Conner
I hate to be a downer, but just because they're putting him on waivers doesn't automatically mean they'll send him downifwhen he clears...
They could be doing this simply to keep their options open ahead of the deadline.
Possibly. But there's one less obstacle for Gibbons and Megna. Conner was coming back either way.
I haven't seen anything this season to show me that Conner has preference over Gibbons. The latter has played with our best player for quite awhile now and was flanking Sutter before that.
Megna is in WBS still so this doesn't stand true.
There isn't one less obstacle for Megna as he isn't on the team. Wouldn't be surprised if he plays on the top line in WBS bumping Megna now if he is in the same side.
Well, now everyone *****ing that Megna and Gibbons will never got shots on the third line can shut up.
Possibly. But there's one less obstacle for Gibbons and Megna. Conner was coming back either way.
I haven't seen anything this season to show me that Conner has preference over Gibbons. The latter has played with our best player for quite awhile now and was flanking Sutter before that.
There's 14 forwards including Bennett now and not 15.
The negativity on this board has reached pretty ridiculous levels. Think positive for a change folks.
You just called everyone out over Gibbons/Megna and there's literally no proof that this move has anything to do with either of them.
1) someone would have to be brought in to play 1RW to get Gibbons on the 3rd line
2) Megna would have to be recalled