You think they won’t bother taking any arbitration ruling with Chaput? I don’t blame you for the idea at all, just curiousChicago opening up a contract.
If you go to arbitration with a Wirtz, you are an ex-HawkYou think they won’t bother taking any arbitration ruling with Chaput? I don’t blame you for the idea at all, just curious
Makes sense. Hawks have been most cap conscious team over the last 12 years.If you go to arbitration with a Wirtz, you are an ex-Hawk
You think they won’t bother taking any arbitration ruling with Chaput? I don’t blame you for the idea at all, just curious
Wasn't chaput the guy Desjardins overplayed the crap out of 2 years ago?
Anyways AHLer for AHLer
The Hawks are at 44 contracts. I think they'll let him walk.
That could still happen lol. Chicago can use some help on DAll I could see before opening the trade forum was (CHI/VAN) and the start of TANner Keros name. Scramble in here thinking it was Tanev.
Actually with BWC here. I think he could be a good depth player. I think he would benefit from a shift to the wing, personally. He’s got some good speed.Kero has potential to be a solid 4th liner in NHL
He showed signs of being that player in 16-17 but regressed last year at both NHL and AHL level
Change of scenery for him could be just the thing he needs to get his game back on track
Kero is a one-way as well at 800k this year. Dump a salary and contract spot.
Nice for the Canucks because he isn't a veteran in the AHL yet
Not really seeing this as such a big trade some are making it seem to be. Chaput was pretty meh for us and looks like this Kero guy the same for Chicago. Meh in 5 years will probably all forget this trade ever happend
Re read the first page of this threadWho's making it out to be a big trade? This trade is the epitome of meh.