Torontoborn
Registered User
- Jan 9, 2019
- 900
- 305
Lets not forget he borrowed Shaw to MTL for Alex DeBrincat
Really? I never looked into the trade that Habs gave up to get Shaw. Almost as bad as the Gomez trade for Mcdonugh
Lets not forget he borrowed Shaw to MTL for Alex DeBrincat
Chiarot is definitely tougher than Benn, Deslaurier almost never played and while Shaw is tough, undersized, strong and gritty players is something Montreal has more than enough of already.
Do you even know who Kotkaniemi is? 6’3, and while he is a lightweight he’s only 18 YO, give him time.Like who? Kotkaniemi? haha
You have a point. I thought their toughness/jam kept them from being bottom feeders in the East. I hope they find their skilled replacements, but I doubt it.
Like who? Kotkaniemi? haha
Can someone "Big Picture" this trade from a MTL perspective.
Why would MB do this? They can still use a player like Shaw and he had a good season last year.
It looks to me like they are rebuilding with all the draft picks acquired in this transaction.
Rebuild?
The Habs will be softer than Charmin toilet paper next season with Shaw, Benn and Deslauriers gone!
Lets not forget he borrowed Shaw to MTL for Alex DeBrincat
Do you even know who Kotkaniemi is? 6’3, and while he is a lightweight he’s only 18 YO, give him time.
Hes talking about, Domi, Gallagher, Byron, do you watch hockey?
Lets not forget he borrowed Shaw to MTL for Alex DeBrincat
I suspect that Chiarrot will replace Benn in that department (probably an upgrade there), Cousins is less rough than Shaw, but wont get concussions and Deslaurienr wasnt playing much anyways. I think that Weal or whoever plays on the 4th can pick up the slackThe Habs will be softer than Charmin toilet paper next season with Shaw, Benn and Deslauriers gone!
I didnt read all the posts, but im sure someone pointed out that we gave 2 seconds, one of which became Debrincat, but i also seriously doubt mtl would have picked him. Montreal seemed set on holding on to the outdated notion that size is better than talent. Samuel Girard or even Carter Hart would probably have been higher on the habs list.
true, but does not bold well for Toronto as well, who were 4 points away from us and missing the playoffs. If we factor in Marner missing/or part of the season, the Leafs are in far worse shape.A lot of teams underperformed last year and got better this offseason. NJ is better with a healthy Hall, Florida got better, Buffalo got better. I think Montreal will be further down the standing this year.
No one trades 1st OV, especially not in a good year like that.I wouldn't be surprised if MB strikes out that he offers all his picks next year to draft Laferniere with the draft being in Montreal.
1) Girard is small.
2) Montreal drafted Will Bitten and Victor Mete in the same draft.
If Montreal wasn't going to draft DeBrincat with the pick, I doubt size would be the deciding reason.
1) 5'10 is somewhat acceptable, considering the average is 6". Debrincat is 5'7
2) Good point
Caufield is the same size as Debrincat. Can't wait to see what he's got.
true, but does not bold well for Toronto as well, who were 4 points away from us and missing the playoffs. If we factor in Marner missing/or part of the season, the Leafs are in far worse shape.
And the same people laughed at the Habs picking Caufield. Go figure.Very dumb comment like everybody new Debrincat would turn out like he did like the habs would of picked him.
Yea lost Kadri and Gardiner, and possibly will have Marner missing time **Possibly** I don't really see how this team got better. Like you said, other teams did and just going by your logic. It is easy to spin and say it towards Montreal but no I guess your narrative does not apply to Toronto, only Montreal is my point.I disagree, even without Marner this team is just as good. Their defense completely let them down combined with their poor pk and powerplay. With their additions this offseason, with Nylander being in camp, and all their young guys Matthews, Kap, Johnsson etc one more year under their belt. This team will surpass 100 points and hopefully will finish ahead of Boston.
Yea lost Kadri and Gardiner, and possibly will have Marner missing time **Possibly** I don't really see how this team got better. Like you said, other teams did and just going by your logic. It is easy to spin and say it towards Montreal but no I guess your narrative does not apply to Toronto, only Montreal is my point.
No it's not.Really? I never looked into the trade that Habs gave up to get Shaw. Almost as bad as the Gomez trade for Mcdonugh
I wouldn't be surprised if MB strikes out that he offers all his picks next year to draft Lafreniere with the draft being in Montreal.