Which is precisely what I don't understand. The best way to get better is to play against better competition. This notion that players X's development was stymied by playing in the NHL too early is superstition imo. Likely, those players weren't going to cut it regardless. If the kid is ready to compete in the NHL, his game will adapt to whatever its capacity is at the NHL level. Who's really to say that his development would better take place in the AHL than the NHL? The kid is super confident and a hard worker. If he's going to be an effective NHL defenseman, he's going to become one whether he plays in the AHL first or not.
I kind of agree with this, and was thinking about it the other day.
The notion of "rushing" to the NHL is a fallacy, to me. If the kid is ready and able to keep up with the Pro game, he can do it, period.
The thing is, if 18 year olds come up and struggle later, we deem he was rushed. What about the 100's of 18 year olds that went straight to the minors and never made it to the NHL?
Perhaps - it may be that certain players can handle the NHL and certain can't. No amount of "AHL seasoning" will prepare you for that - you can either hang with NHLers after a few years or you can't.
The young players that bust in the NHL if they start there @ 18 old - there is no way to prove that they wouldn't have busted anyway had they started in the AHL.
Ghost and Morin can hang. The question, to me, in NHL vs AHL/Juniors is the role they're given.
If Morin hangs around as defensive d-man and never gets offensive opportunities, that part of his game may not develop. This is when I would say send him back and let him play in all situations. However, if indications are that he's being sent back and won't get those chances anyway, I see no point.
Better to control those situations here and work him into more offensive roles (if you wish that part of his game to improve, which we all do) since you have control while he's here; instead of watching him on the bench during the PP in juniors.