Confirmed Signing with Link: [CGY] Cam Talbot signs with the Flames (1 year, $2.75M)

Flames Fanatic

Mediocre
Aug 14, 2008
13,362
2,906
Cochrane
I am whelmed. As I said in the other thread, we survived Mike Smith at his worst, so in theory Talbot can't sink us. One way or another, one Alberta team is gonna be mad.
 

super6646

Registered User
Apr 16, 2018
17,905
15,768
Calgary
Meh. He did a little better in Edmonton than Smith did, and the later had a tirefire defense, so who knows?
 

DFF

Registered User
Feb 28, 2002
22,330
6,576
Good choice by him. He has a chance to steal the starting job if he plays well. It's rittich to lose but you never know
 

Pasha71

Registered User
Dec 30, 2017
713
266
So who'll be No 1 in Calgary: Rittich or Talbot? Asking for a friend (well, for myself. I have Smith and Rittich in a keeper league).
 
  • Like
Reactions: backburner
Jan 29, 2009
4,646
1,895
Edmonton/Calgary
So who'll be No 1 in Calgary: Rittich or Talbot? Asking for a friend (well, for myself. I have Smith and Rittich in a keeper league).

Rittich in the sense that he will get the opportunity to take the reigns at the start, but I don't think his leash will be too big. If all goes well.. Rittich would probably start 50ish games I would think.
 

backburner

Registered User
May 6, 2011
1,424
269
NJ, USA
So who'll be No 1 in Calgary: Rittich or Talbot? Asking for a friend (well, for myself. I have Smith and Rittich in a keeper league).
I have Talbot and Varlamov for a contract of 1 in a salary league lol. traded rittich at 10 last year
 

dookers9

Registered User
Mar 30, 2008
2,518
122
Edmonton
Ah yes. These sorts of deals - big or small, and for the record, this would be small - always stoke the disdain between the two teams. It's good. The disdain has been watered-down over the years.

Especially if Smith winds up in Edmonton rather than Mrazek or other.
 

Snakepit

Registered User
Nov 19, 2013
6,110
1,769
Same thing the guys in Sportsnet radio were saying yesterday. Seems like a sure thing with lots of guys reporting it now


So who'll be No 1 in Calgary: Rittich or Talbot? Asking for a friend (well, for myself. I have Smith and Rittich in a keeper league).

Rittich will be the starter. Treliving even said so on the radio yesterday
 

DJJones

Registered User
Nov 18, 2014
10,242
3,547
Calgary
Not going to complain about a 1 year show me contract.

Could work out great, and if it doesn't. Oh well
 

tony d

New poll series coming from me on June 3
Jun 23, 2007
76,596
4,556
Behind A Tree
Not sure he'll solve their goalie problems but on a 1 year deal it probably doesn't hurt to give him a chance.
 

BruinsBtn

Registered User
Dec 24, 2006
22,080
13,546
I like a guy who is betting on himself. He wants to prove that he can play behind a decent NHL defense. Talbot looked really good a couple years ago and this would put Calgary right back into the mix for the Cup.
 

Pasha71

Registered User
Dec 30, 2017
713
266
I have Talbot and Varlamov for a contract of 1 in a salary league lol. traded rittich at 10 last year

Well... when the last season started, I had Smith, Talbot and Allen. Three starters, right? Yeah... no. I added Domingue when Vasilevskiy was injured, which was awesome until Vasy came back. I traded Talbot away when he moved to Philly. And I traded for Rittich to at least have a Calgary duo.

Now, I have Smith, Rittich, Allen and Domingue. Can protect two. Hopefully Rittich if he is a Calgary starter and Smith if he is a starter somewhere else.
 

Turning Mangiapanese

Registered User
Jun 18, 2011
1,553
620
This is... OK. Would be awesome if he turned his career around in Calgary but in all honesty I can't see it happening, not with our goalie coaches. A more modest hope is that he holds the fort for 20-30 games while Rittich improves.
 

biturbo19

Registered User
Jul 13, 2010
25,890
10,951
I like a guy who is betting on himself. He wants to prove that he can play behind a decent NHL defense. Talbot looked really good a couple years ago and this would put Calgary right back into the mix for the Cup.

Yeah. I like the sentiment from Talbot taking a "prove it" deal for a shot at playing behind a potential contender. If he does manage to bounce back in that environment, it'll be a great signing for the Flames.

It just feels like Calgary have made it an annual tradition to gamble on something like this as a half-baked ploy to fix their goaltending situation. Not sure there's really much better to gamble on this particular year, but it feels like they're always determined to take the lowest cost/biggest risk option pretty much every summer. :dunno:
 

HighLifeMan

#SnowyStrong
Feb 26, 2009
7,299
2,469
Yeah. I like the sentiment from Talbot taking a "prove it" deal for a shot at playing behind a potential contender. If he does manage to bounce back in that environment, it'll be a great signing for the Flames.

It just feels like Calgary have made it an annual tradition to gamble on something like this as a half-baked ploy to fix their goaltending situation. Not sure there's really much better to gamble on this particular year, but it feels like they're always determined to take the lowest cost/biggest risk option pretty much every summer. :dunno:

The higher ups here have faith in Rittich. This only furthers to prove that. Rittich was absolutely rolling with a .920 sv% prior to sustaining an injury that really hampered his ability to play down the stretch.

I love it. If Talbot can play at the level he has for 5 out of his 6 NHL seasons this is a fantastic deal for Calgary, and he has shown the ability to really excel in a limited role.

Makes a ton of sense for Calgary considering there cap situation.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad