He's fine. He won't jump out at you but that's not a bad thing. He just misses too much time with injuries. When healthy he's a 2nd pairing guy who could maybe still reach his ceiling.
From what I remember his ceiling at the draft was supposed to be a top 4 guy all the time. The knock on him was always not being a top pairing guy
The knock was that he had no offensive game. But he was expected to be a top pairing two way guy. Some believed he would be like Scott Niedermayer, which is obviously lofty expectations.
I remember that draft like yesterday. They had said his offensive side was non existent and that he would not be a top guy but his chances of busting completely was also extremely low
Some scouts say what you said, no offensive game, some said there was more to give there (McKenzie's scouts).
Murray is a great fit as the shutdown guy on the 2nd pairing. He’s not going to get PP time here, nor is he going to pass Werenski for the 1st pairing LHD spot. Maybe he’s hit his “ceiling” with Columbus, but I think he’s got more to give if he were playing on a lesser defensive group (and, of course, played 70-75+ games).
Brock Nelson for Murray
Some scouts say what you said, no offensive game, some said there was more to give there (McKenzie's scouts).
After we lost the guy from your avi, our defence took a huuuuge unfixable hit, we can't afford to lose Murr.I'm not sure if that's fair value, but a trade like that makes sense for both sides. The Islanders need a guy to replace CDH and it wouldn't hurt the Blue Jackets to add some offence.
Just like Taveres, Hanafin, Anisomov it's a game apparently.Why did 90% of the tweets misspell Yakupov as Yakopov?
Just like Taveres, Hanafin, Anisomov it's a game apparently.
i haven't really watched this guy since he was a rookie, but he looked very mature and impressive then. i remember his brains looked elite.
how is he now? has he improved, stagnated, regressed with or despite all the injuries?
just looking at his stats, it looks like his offense never developed. but would you compare him to, say, chris tanev, another guy who always gets hurt, isn't flashy, won't score you points, but is a brain surgeon on his own side of the ice?
I haven't seen any advanced stats thay show him as a good defensive guy. His c.f. rel makes him look like he has been dragging down his partners.
His other possession and quality of opponent numbers make him look like a decent number 5, 4 on a weak team.
Can he play on the right side?
I'm not sure if that's fair value, but a trade like that makes sense for both sides. The Islanders need a guy to replace CDH and it wouldn't hurt the Blue Jackets to add some offence.
Columbus' win/lost with him in the lineup vs without is sick...he has been quality, just not a #2 pick quality
If he’s played on the right side, it’s been very sparingly. He’s a LHD through and through.I haven't seen any advanced stats thay show him as a good defensive guy. His c.f. rel makes him look like he has been dragging down his partners.
His other possession and quality of opponent numbers make him look like a decent number 5, 4 on a weak team.
Can he play on the right side?
The few to.es I've seen him since junior he has looked like a guy who you want more from, but his injuries seemed to have killed his skating.If he’s played on the right side, it’s been very sparingly. He’s a LHD through and through.
Just watch him when he plays for Columbus. He’s a steady, calming presence who doesn’t make boneheaded decisions. He’s a good player.
He's been thrown every rookie AND Jack Johnson at him to babysit during last years. And he's been good at it. He's perfect fit with Nutivaara, kinda like what M. Methot was to EK.The few to.es I've seen him since junior he has looked like a guy who you want more from, but his injuries seemed to have killed his skating.
Don't see Murray as part of a package with Werenski out for the beginning of the season. He'll get a lot of ice time and possibly play with Jones on top pair in Z's absence. He's part of the top 4 and would be just fine if he could stay healthy. Unfortuantely that's a big if...1 yr deal so that he is a) on an "earn it deal" and b) still RFA next year for a possible long term deal
Also wouldn't be shocked if he were part of an offense upgrade package trade
Yes, he's in their plans. One year keeps him at RFA and let's the CBJ see if he can actually have a healthy year and play as expected. He'll be signed longer term next year if he shows he's healthyA one year contract at his age would suggest no
Brock Nelson for Murray