zman77
Registered User
- Oct 1, 2015
- 14,449
- 36,127
Because high sticks stopping play happen anywhere on the ice, and you can't use the crossbar for reference. Closer to the net where deflection plays happen, the crossbar is a better reference since it's a fixed point and you're trying to protect the head of an often crouching goalie.This was actually more of an example of NHL rules making no sense. If the puck had went into the net it's a high stick and the goal gets waived off, but because it didn't it's no high stick. Why should there be two different high stick standards because if you go to a single standard things like this wouldn't happen. In reality the call didn't change the outcome because a goal was definitely coming, if it had been waived off it just delays the inevitable.
Because high sticks stopping play happen anywhere on the ice, and you can't use the crossbar for reference. Closer to the net where deflection plays happen, the crossbar is a better reference since it's a fixed point and you're trying to protect the head of an often crouching goalie.
That's as close of a frame as I could get. The other angle shows the puck making contact with Svech's stick below the tape. You can't overturn that.
View media item 7397
We need a police report I don't believe it.HE DID SOMETHING!
Necas dissapeared. Sad considering he was dark horse for Calder.