GDT: carnyi

[Penaltykiller17]

That was classic karma for Barzal’s dive

 

[3CanesInTheBox]

I LOVE EVERYONE IN THIS BAR!!!!

next

You know what to do, cap

 

[cptjeff]

Inconclusive review, call on the ice stands. Thank f***ing god.

Sucks we gave an extra point to the team we're chasing, but we got the win. But we still ain't in a good position, and we can't take the foot off the gas again.

 

[MustardStew]

that's a surprise! way to go Vinny!! huge!

 

[BB88]

That’s a major goal in many ways.

The team was desperate for a win, Tro was desperate for a goal.

Get them both in OT

 

[Joe McGrath]

The only thing I can think of is that it hit the heel of his blade which may have been even with the cross bar. The toe ways way over.

 

[GoldiFox]

Canes 19-0-1 when leading after the first. They should score early more often.

 

[Anton Dubinchuk]

Love to be wrong. Nice

Call on the ice stands, so it's inconclusive.

Would be very difficult to conclusively call something above the shoulder, when the "shoulder" is so vague anyway (top of the shoulder pad? Does the whole puck have to be above the whole shoulder? What if he's crouching and comes up and his shoulder's now in two different places during the play, etc.)

That said, I didn't know you could review high sticks in the zone (i.e. not the one that actually scored the goal).

 

[zman77]

 

[MrazeksVengeance]

.

 

[RibFrabcus]

The only thing I can think of is that it hit the heel of his blade which may have been even with the cross bar. The toe ways way over.

It's the position of the puck at time of contact vs his shoulder on that play is it not?

 

[3CanesInTheBox]

Inconclusive review, call on the ice stands. Thank f***ing god.

Sucks we gave an extra point to the team we're chasing, but we got the win. But we still ain't in a good position, and we can't take the foot off the gas again.

Annoying yes, but I'm hoping this is just a huge mental hurdle for this team to finally grab two points.

Also, so happy for Tro. this could be HUGE for him.

 

[PG Canuck]

best guess? It was inconclusive: one angle it looked below, the other it looked above. Both were of about the same quality to judge the play.

Too hard to determine if it was at the shoulders or not. It looked right in the vicinity of Svech’s shoulders. Ref calling it a goal on the ice was massive.

 

[zman77]

 

[Primetime8]

That was classic karma for Barzal’s dive

I had the same thought. Islanders cant blame the refs when they missed calling embellishment on that

 

[Joe McGrath]

It's the position of the puck at time of contact vs his shoulder on that play is it not?

No because it goes off the crossbar after that. It’s a shot essentially.

 

[Mathios]

I would've been okay if they ruled no goal, it looked like it was above the shoulder.

Also, haha, f*** you Barzal you dumb mf you singlehandedly lost a game

 

[zman77]

 

[DaveG]

Too hard to determine if it was at the shoulders or not. It looked right in the vicinity of Svech’s shoulders. Ref calling it a goal on the ice was massive.

Exactly. When you're unable to determine the call on the ice stands. The two angles looked as different as they possibly could for making the judgement so goal on the ice = goal after review.

 

[BB88]

It's the position of the puck at time of contact vs his shoulder on that play is it not?

Yep.

Islanders crew said as it didn’t go straight in it was shoulder not crossbar that mattered

 

[StrmSurge]

Woooooooh Vinny Trocheck from my old team FLA, I know the name well. Those points put us in the WC slot right?

 

[AD Skinner]

Oh my god it went in off Mayfield's face

 

[PG Canuck]

No because it goes off the crossbar after that. It’s a shot essentially.

Yeha if it went in, that’s easily no goal. Thank you pipe.

 

[zman77]

 

[Anton Dubinchuk]

No because it goes off the crossbar after that. It’s a shot essentially.

But that's not what scored the goal. Hitting the puck above the crossbar doesn't blow the play dead if it's still below your shoulder. It just causes a scored goal to not count. Otherwise anything can be considered a "shot", even if it's in your own zone (maybe just a weak, really bad shot).

Hitting the crossbar with your stick above the crossbar and below your shoulder is perfectly legal. No play blown dead, no goal called off (since no goal was scored).