DaveG
Noted Jerk
The ONLY way this trade makes any sense is if he's our backup next year. If we're planning on Reimer-Forsberg-Ned in net we're beyond f***ed.
I didn’t miss that. Darling’s buyout is much better and Florida was desperate to move Riemer to bring in Bob. We got them out of a jam and paid to do so. The only reason to do this is to save cash, which means we are keeping Riemer ourselves, and with both the Chicago castoff and Ned as low cost backup options already, we will be starting the year with Riemer as our starter.did you miss that we traded darling in the deal? darling's contract is much worse
I was actually hoping for Optimus Reim. He is what the Forsberg addition should have been.
Here's to hoping he isn't the #1 though. And that Florida retained and paid assets.
Edit: they took Darling. Florida does this because Reiner's buyout would have costed them more next year. Allows them more flexibility and gives the Canes a true 1B.
I'd love to see Waddell try and sell that. He said a started would be added. Nobody gets a starter for Scott Darling + 6th.
I expect Mrazek/Lehner/Varlamov to still be added. Forsberg to waivers/AHL.
I didn’t miss that. Darling’s buyout is much better and Florida was desperate to move Riemer to bring in Bob. We got them out of a jam and paid to do so. The only reason to do this is to save cash, which means we are keeping Riemer ourselves, and with both the Chicago castoff and Ned as low cost backup options already, we will be starting the year with Riemer as our starter.
this is all based on the assumption that the team isn't trying to sign a number one, which appears to be wrong.I didn’t miss that. Darling’s buyout is much better and Florida was desperate to move Riemer to bring in Bob. We got them out of a jam and paid to do so. The only reason to do this is to save cash, which means we are keeping Riemer ourselves, and with both the Chicago castoff and Ned as low cost backup options already, we will be starting the year with Riemer as our starter.
Reimer is not a 1B. If he plays more than 15 to 20 games, you are in big trouble.
Last season is an excellent argument! We know he puts up at least leagues average goaltending behind our guys and they trust him. Now we are back to square one and we will have a younger D-core looking over their shoulders wonder if this guy will be able to bail them out on some mistakes or if he will magnify them. If we aren’t bringing in a guy with bonafides or a history of good performance with us, we are risking a substantial step backwards.how is that any worse than mrazek-forsberg-ned
i'd love to hear an argument as to why reimer is worse than mrazek, other than "last season"
There's your answer.
Or you could argue he was probably worse than mediocre for half his season last year, and then lights out for his second half. Mrazek still has questions, though I'll be happy if we can have him back.Last season is an excellent argument! We know he puts up at least leagues average goaltending behind our guys and they trust him. Now we are back to square one and we will have a younger D-core looking over their shoulders wonder if this guy will be able to bail them out on some mistakes or if he will magnify them. If we aren’t bringing in a guy with bonafides or a history of good performance with us, we are risking a substantial step backwards.
He's been trending down the last two years, is on the wrong side of 30, and is a career backup.how is that any worse than mrazek-forsberg-ned
i'd love to hear an argument as to why reimer is worse than mrazek, other than "last season"
So this means Mac is gone if they're trying to get Mrazek re-signed or get Varly. On another note though I'm surprised a taker was found for Darling.
Sure they are trying. Just like they were trying to keep both Mrazek and McBackup. I bet they are trying, but using this to say to Mrazek that if you don’t accept our lowball salary/term, we will just go with this other guy. Let’s hope Petr blinks first.this is all based on the assumption that the team isn't trying to sign a number one, which appears to be wrong.
Yep, Waddell said yesterday that he'd be playing elsewhere. Apparently he "cut us out of talks" pretty early on.
What are we going to do with all these goalies?