Hivemind
We're Touched
He is the worst coach I have ever seen.
He may have been bad, but once again this is ridiculous. He's more in line with Davis Payne-level bad than Wayne Gretzky-level bad.
He is the worst coach I have ever seen.
He may have been bad, but once again this is ridiculous. He's more in line with Davis Payne-level bad than Wayne Gretzky-level bad.
Literally TWO posts before this one I was planning out my post genuinely asking what about Oates -- either his approach, style, experience -- made his tenure such a failure. Thanks so much for anticipating my question and answering in advance!
With that out of the way, I am trying very hard not to get overly excited about two games. The buy-in is there, the structure is there, the skill is there, and it looks like the confidence is there. I'm hoping the results continue to be there, but even if they aren't consistently, as long as the process remains sound and consistent, it won't take long for the results to follow. And as long as the process is right, the team should be so much more enjoyable to watch.
Looking at Trotz makes me wonder what watching the Redskins would be like had they hired Jeff Fisher when he was available. Like Trotz, a guy who hasn't had the ultimate success, but always seems to have gotten more out of his teams than the talent alone says he should have. And always had his team play tough and smart -- two things that haven't been able to be said of the Redskins for a couple of decades now.
How do you figure? Is there a single thing he was even average at? The one positive aspect of the team's play was down to Blaine Forsythe.He may have been bad, but once again this is ridiculous. He's more in line with Davis Payne-level bad than Wayne Gretzky-level bad.
He may have been bad, but once again this is ridiculous. He's more in line with Davis Payne-level bad than Wayne Gretzky-level bad.
to be fair if we did that trotz would say its worth it and we here would love the idea of a caps players standing up for himself.
He may have been bad, but once again this is ridiculous. He's more in line with Davis Payne-level bad than Wayne Gretzky-level bad.
How are you grading bad....
Did Payne or Gretzky coach goalies not to play the shots? Goaltending is a HUGE part of every single game.
I am not sure my opinion is up for debate on this one
Honestly I could have done a better job solely because I would've let the assistants do their jobs. I'm convinced Oates was getting revenge on the organization for something or other.
Honestly I could have done a better job solely because I would've let the assistants do their jobs. I'm convinced Oates was getting revenge on the organization for something or other.
Don't think the 'Skins comparison is apt. GMGM, for all his flaws, did know how to draft. We've had a good scout team to boot, for years. 'Skins have absolutely nothing. Talent is trash, GM is trash, scouting department is trash.
Fun read, thank you man of metalFor reference, read up on Bill LaForge and Ned Harkness. Though, showing up and rearranging someone's furniture to teach hockey does sound like something Oates would do.
This quote form the Harkness article is exactly what I think of Oates. He reminded me of a kid who tries to edit all the players in a video game just to see if he can make the best.I can’t evaluate (Harkness) as a coach because he isn’t one. He can’t coach
Basically Oates coached all the Caps to play hockey like Adam Oates - putting a premium on read and react. As a player, few were better than Oates at reading the play.
But the reason why Adam Oates was a special player was that most hockey players don't have that as their primary skill tool - so a guy that is highly adept at reading and reacting becomes a unique asset when playing with guys who on the ice who are mostly initiators - whether through speed, physicality, puck-handling, tenacity, shot, etc.
But a team of Adam Oateses, is a team of passive, read-reactors. You have to have guys on the ice being aggressive and taking the play to the other team, otherwise you're on your heels the whole time and you're never in control of the game - the tempo is dictated to you, instead of by you.
Oates, as we all know, never tried to coach to his player's strengths and weaknesses. Instead, he coached to validate his own analysis of what works and what doesn't for players like Adam Oates.
Obviously, Trotz is taking a very different approach. Just seeing how much more pace we play with is such a relief - guys are pushing the play, instead of worrying that they'll get chided for missing a read.
We seem to have cast off the bonds of passivity - hail Trotzsky.