Acquiring a critical mass of size, strength and snarl to be able to play with the bigger teams is doable, provided you're willing to commit five years to it and not draft or trade for snowflakes and china dolls during this time.
Time to make that decision was 3 years ago or earlier. 2 years ago at the latest. We're already off the "size isn't important" cliff. Pining for a change in strategy during the Crosby/Malkin era is pointless now.
Yeah, you guys are right. If we'd have drafted Lowry instead of Harrington, Hayes instead of Bennett, Jenner or Saad instead of Morrow, Yakimov instead of Guentzel, Trouba instead of Pouliot, had a D of Maatta/Letang/Dumoulin/Despres/Trouba/anyone, had flipped Kunitz for Hartnell, drafted Larrson instead of trading for the horrible David Perron and if we'd have pulled off that Sutter + a 3rd for Kesler deal instead of acquiring Kessel, there's a good chance we'd be right near the top of our division. But we didn't do that. We continued to get smaller. Continued to get softer. And drafted basically just for hockey sense and nothing else.
Know what we can do to fix this before Geno or Sid washes up? Nothing.
There's a 5 year lead time on any sort of organizational strategy. This die was cast at the draft table in 2010. If we buy a new set of dice, expect the dividends to start coming in the winter of 2021.