3.89% vs 5.9%. Ouch but needs more contextComparison would be Jannik Hansen. WOOF.
If we're calling balls and strikes, this is a certified Jimbo special minus the extra year or 2. Unreal that this team is hardballing/trading Miller or Garland to make room for a player like this, especially when that player is more of a tweener rather than a legit top-6 guy.
Bad acquisition, especially if he doesn't maintain a 20-25 goal pace.
That was my first thought. He might not be better/more productive than Pearson but his speed will change the look of the team on the ice when he's out there. Agree with the first point as well.Like the player alot but that contract looks dangggerous
Gotta think Pearson is gone now
This team has no cap. People are complaining about Pearson at 3.25 for 2 more years, but without a doubt I would take that for what he provides relative to his hit than this guy at 4.753.89% vs 5.9%. Ouch but needs more context
Hansen never made it to UFA and never put up the stats or impact that Mikheyev has. Also Hansen had a strong MNTC which I don't think Mikheyev is going to get
Sea water is salty.Francesco is playing with his toy and JR is a complete f***ing moron. The GM/AGM's are puppets and our analytics team are there for show.