Larsen looked really good at the start of the season, his defensive game was better than hisnoffence. However he got injured and never got back into a groove. Then Taylor Hall murdered him
Larsen looked really good at the start of the season, his defensive game was better than hisnoffence. However he got injured and never got back into a groove. Then Taylor Hall murdered him
Sorry, but at no point last season did Larsen 'look really good'....was a disaster with whomever he was paired with....brought 'zero offense' to the table and swatted away like a fly in his own zone....in fact if he hadn't been so bad, I doubt Stecher would have gotten a shot and likely spent the entire year in Utica....so that's one positive.
He had nothing to offer, he played less than 5 mins a gameHolm did beat out +10 Swedish NHL(-ish) D-men for the national team. Most of them borderline NHL-ers.
But some of them actually have an ordinary position at their respective teams, i.e. actual NHL-players as Gunnarsson, Oduya and J. Ericsson (might be injuries there but I have not read about it and I have not seen that they did get the offer to play at the WC).
Many of the selected D-men where offensive D-men so Holm might have had something to offer with his defensive play.
Chicago and Toronto.
In the interview he said he chose Vancouver because his gut told him to.
He had nothing to offer, he played less than 5 mins a game
He doesn't seem to have the physical game that compares, but I'd like to see if he can carve out what Carl Gunnarson is now for the Blues, a 5/6 depth defenceman who is mobile enough to the NHL but really doesn't excel at anything. Just an all around every day player. That'd be the high water mark of potential I'd try to keep for this guy, that way if he's just #1 in Utica we aren't all that disappointed.
Hell, anyone else consider just keeping him in Utica if he's at all any good to stay away from the tirefire mess that will be Vancouver next season?
I don't know about really good. His defensive game was competent but he was brought in for his offense and delivered basically none.
I do agree that he was much worse after returning from injury though.
Really a zero-risk signing.....kinda' shocked that a guy who's 25 and spent as long as he has in the SHL, is even eligible to sign an entry-level contract....but it's only for a year, and he can even be sent to the minors without having to clear waivers....and if nothing else, reports are the Canucks signed him out from under the noses of the Leafs and Hawks, so that's a positive.
I pretty much roll my eyes at Pierre ever since he called Larsen a poor man's Erik Karlsson.
Craig Button was saying that he was familiar with Larsen in the Dallas organization...said that "Larsen is not an NHL calibre player"
Another solid, reasonable move by Benning. Thus supporting my theory that when given a reasonable objective that is achievable, he can be a solid GM.
Will love to see the results on the ice next year. Hope for the best. Go nux go!!
Another solid, reasonable move by Benning. Thus supporting my theory that when given a reasonable objective that is achievable, he can be a solid GM.
Will love to see the results on the ice next year. Hope for the best. Go nux go!!
I have no recollection of Larsen being good here in any way, shape or form.
I admire your blind faith. Will check back after several miserable years to see how you're doing then.
But Holm clearly going to have a better year than Larsen, right? Come on... it's not a high bar.
If we trade Tanev, are you okay with Holm as D4? Or Gudbranson / Jordan Subban as D4?
But Holm clearly going to have a better year than Larsen, right? Come on... it's not a high bar.
If we trade Tanev, are you okay with Holm as D4? Or Gudbranson / Jordan Subban as D4?
I was hoping Larsen would be better than Weber...Why couldn't Holm be worse than Larsen?
Were you one of the people who said there was no way that Larsen could be worse than Weber?