coldsteel79
Registered User
i bolded the things that matter
thats a lot of useless fluff. that scout sucks
Verv you need to get out and scout, your way with words would be a blast to read
i bolded the things that matter
thats a lot of useless fluff. that scout sucks
Best defenseman in the WHL.
Yeah, he was Sweden 6-7 defenseman in that tournament. And Sweden even had up to avarage defense there. Their top 4 was clear; Anton Strålman-Oscar Hedman and Niklas Andersson-Tobias Viklund. Then they have never drafted defensemans Tommy Wargh (who wasn't later in his career good enough even to SM-Liiga) and Petter Ullman (who finished his career quickly). And Edler.He was supposed to play a lot at the WJHC but instead was benched by team Sweden.
anyways the way he's described there, why doesnt he do everything really well? his skating, iq, defensive ability, and excellent vision should lead to ****tons of goals or something???? i mean thats a lot of superlatives to describe a third round pick thats been somewhere been mediocre and ok
anyways the way he's described there, why doesnt he do everything really well? his skating, iq, defensive ability, and excellent vision should lead to ****tons of goals or something???? i mean thats a lot of superlatives to describe a third round pick thats been somewhere been mediocre and ok
Are you kidding?
Edler was a brain dead defenseman that piled up points in his junior year.
He was supposed to play a lot at the WJHC but instead was benched by team Sweden.
anyways the way he's described there, why doesnt he do everything really well? his skating, iq, defensive ability, and excellent vision should lead to ****tons of goals or something???? i mean thats a lot of superlatives to describe a third round pick thats been somewhere been mediocre and ok
anyways the way he's described there, why doesnt he do everything really well? his skating, iq, defensive ability, and excellent vision should lead to ****tons of goals or something???? i mean thats a lot of superlatives to describe a third round pick thats been somewhere been mediocre and ok
He plays on one of the worst teams in the league. But after a slow start he has put up some goals and points.
Obligatory Brisebois pre-draft "highlight" video
Obligatory Brisebois pre-draft "highlight" video
Obligatory Brisebois pre-draft "highlight" video
Man your negativity just never takes a day off or a thread off.
.
Probably the same reason Chris Tanev isn't very productive, even though he possesses all those same traits. He's a defensive defenseman that doesn't take many risks, while lacking the big shot you need to score many goals.
It takes about 5 minutes of watching this kid play to see why he was projected to go so high in the draft - in the middle of the 2nd Rd. Just a terrific feel for the game, nice mobility and enough puck skills to keep himself out of danger at all times. Has all the tools you need to be a quality defensive player at the pro level.
I honestly don't know much about him. 4 goals, 8 assists for 12 points in 28 games this year. -10. Last year he was a shocking -40 (by far worst on his team).
I'll defer to those who know more about him, but I've never been a fan of this prospect.
I dont know if anyone of you guys actually have expecations of Brisebois to be a legitimate dman in the NHL. This is a player thats almost impossible to project, i dont know if anyone knows much about him.
i bolded the things that matter
thats a lot of useless fluff. that scout sucks