Ozone
Registered User
- Jan 19, 2013
- 15,102
- 5,200
Didn’t we do the same thing to Arturs Silovs last year? And had it spelt Silvos?
Get it together, equipment team!
Didn’t we do the same thing to Arturs Silovs last year? And had it spelt Silvos?
Get it together, equipment team!
I give Hirsch some leash because, like someone said, he does seem like a good dude, and he shared some pretty personal stuff in the name of mental health awareness. It’s hard for me to bag too hard on him. That said, yeah, he’s not upper echelon for me as a colour guy.I will echo what someone else said that while the first period was painful he did get a bit better. He talks too much and tries too hard to be goofy and self deprecating like Garrett and it just doesn’t work. But I didn’t hate him as much in the third.
Good call.I give Hirsch some leash because, like someone said, he does seem like a good dude, and he shared some pretty personal stuff in the name of mental health awareness. It’s hard for me to bag too hard on him. That said, yeah, he’s not upper echelon for me as a colour guy.
What is this about?
...with Denis Savard spin-o-rama lessons...Garland is Mason Raymond if he figured out how to go to the net.
Notes:
Hirsch might just need some 'seasoning'...
There is some potential there.
He was right about the Canucks needing the 5-2 goal though, was right about Hart fighting it and right that the Flyers lacked confidence in him. I like to focus more on goaltending when watching the game, so I find his analysis good there. Yes, he's having a hard time endearing himself to the fans but he does have good observations, especially when it comes to goaltending. Garrett is quite likeable and his self deprecation lands better, but I find that his takes on goaltending are a product of the era he played in. Hirsch has better insight in that area.
Garland is Mason Raymond if he figured out how to go to the net.
Boom.I think he’s got about 5x the grit of Raymond, which is probably why Raymond never went to the net. Garland seems like a sht disturber too which is always a plus.
Just watching the replay right now and Shorty calling Demko Corey Hirsch was absolutely epic... Hilarious!
Always so negative Ry.I wanted so bad to clip it but Rogers has really cracked down on the ability to do that. Bastards.
Watched the 2nd, end the 3rd, OT/SO...Flat start..Decent 2nd..Great 3rd..Team had it in the bag..Canucks looking unreal in OT so far this season..
How come?Lots and lots and lots of huge and ugly warts right now on the Nucks but they have a huge amount of offensive skill that will lead to some decent results like this until games tighten up.
Tough to tell how good this team actually is still. They look even worse then I though they might be but they have 3/4 pts.
Positives thus far:
1. Pettersson looks 100%
2. OEL looks like at least a top 2 d-man
3. Myers has only been partial awful and not Gudbranson awful
4. Podkolzin doesn't look to be an offensive black-hole
5. Miller still puts up points despite being frustrating as hell
Negatives:
1. OMG is that PK a trainwreck
2. Horvat at 50% faceoffs, everyone else who is taking them is under 40%. That's yikes
3. The defense is still... "work in progress" is generous
4. The lines still seem to be in flux and a mess
5. Demko only looks dialed-in during stretches
How come?