Recalled/Assigned: Canucks Call Up Black Aces (UPDATE: Gaunce called up)
- Thread starter Nuckles
- Start date
Angry Little Elf
My wife came back
LickTheEnvelope
Time to Retool... again...
Luongos Knob
PDO Kings
- Jan 20, 2009
- 4,272
- 524
The Canucks have one of the deepest D-core in the NHL. They (might) lack a top-end guy, but their depth is very good.
Angry Little Elf
My wife came back
Raistlin
Registered User
- Aug 25, 2006
- 4,706
- 3,550
I gotta stop listening to radio... all these callers saying that we don't have depth on D. they must be expecting pre-cap era Wings or something.
we have no #1 yes as most recognise.
but Hammer, Garrison, Edler are capable #2s
Bieksa is a good #3 on most teams
Tanev is an elite #5
Alberts is what you want for #6
Ballard is miscast.... otherwise he's a #4 on most teams, a possible #2 even on bad teams.
Corrado should be good enough as our #7 from the few games we've seen him play. Joslin I have no idea.....
Barker should not be playing in the big leagues if you ask me, but for the limited role he plays, I can live with him being available.
We are top 5 even I would say.
we have no #1 yes as most recognise.
but Hammer, Garrison, Edler are capable #2s
Bieksa is a good #3 on most teams
Tanev is an elite #5
Alberts is what you want for #6
Ballard is miscast.... otherwise he's a #4 on most teams, a possible #2 even on bad teams.
Corrado should be good enough as our #7 from the few games we've seen him play. Joslin I have no idea.....
Barker should not be playing in the big leagues if you ask me, but for the limited role he plays, I can live with him being available.
We are top 5 even I would say.
Vankiller Whale
Fire Benning
Luongos Knob
PDO Kings
- Jan 20, 2009
- 4,272
- 524
No, I mean our d depth after Edler, Hamhuis, Garrison, Bieksa, Tanev, Alberts and Ballard. Barker? Corrado? Andersson? Joslin? ewww...
Angry Little Elf
My wife came back
We keep typing this, but what do other teams depth look like? I mean our top 6 is probably in the top 5 of the league. I'm not sure what people expect from the 7-12th defensman range.
He is at what his job is supposed to be "defending".
mrmyheadhurts
Registered Boozer
He's much worse than I thought possible. The only time he looks slightly useful is when he is in the opposing teams zone. Many posters who had seen him on his other teams warned us at how bad he was, I didn't believe it until I actually saw him play for an extended period of time. He's one of the worst defenders that I've seen on this team in a long time, right up there with a 38 year old Eric Weinrich.
x infinity
Angry Little Elf
My wife came back
Pip
Registered User
Angry Little Elf
My wife came back
If we get 9 deep into our def pool in the playoffs we probly aren't gonna win anyway.
Ad
Upcoming events
-
TO ADVANCE Bayern Munich @ Real Madrid - 2nd leg. 1st leg result: 2-2Wagers: 5Staked: $15,010.00Event closes- Updated:
-
-
Game 3 Belleville Senators @ Cleveland Monsters - Series tied 1-1Wagers: 2Staked: $5,025.00Event closes- Updated:
-
Game 3 Providence Bruins @ Hartford Wolf Pack - Series tied 1-1Wagers: 2Staked: $50.00Event closes
- Updated:
-
Game 3 Hershey Bears @ Lehigh Valley Phantoms - Hershey Bears leads series 2-0Wagers: 3Staked: $2,590.00Event closes
- Updated: