Sykur
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2011
- 954
- 1,228
did we ever get to the bottom of this miller and horvat feud?
because from where i sit, the simplest hypothesis is miller and others were just f***ing done with the coach and wanted to mutiny. horvat, as a responsible captain and general good boy, did what he thought was the right thing to do and tried to protect the chain of command.
now that that is all over, everyone is happy being bros again
This.
I don't think they were specifically mad at each other. I think the whole team was fed up with Green but the only one brash enough to say so was Miller. He was the firebrand, the head mutineer, not afraid to speak his mind. And it wasn't a recent thing either. This goes back to the botched Covid response last year, when Miller went to the media about management, letting them have it with both barrels. I think that was the real catalyst, when the players turned their backs on management. The extension given to Green in the off season must have pissed them right off (and some parting shots from Nate Schmidt seemed to echo the sentiment). Both JB and Aqua were tone deaf to the concerns of the players, it's amazing they got anybody signed at all.
Horvat being the Captain is more of the pragmatic/diplomatic type. If there was any beef, it was more like Horvat trying to keep Miller in line, with the occasional "dude -- shut up! You're not helping". They both wanted the same thing (a change in management), they just had different ways of going about it. Miller uses the stick and Horvat uses the carrot.
I don't think it spilled out onto the ice that much, except for where morale was at an all time low amongst all players from the very start of the season. Miller's pass to Horvat last night proves that the beef was never player v player. It was always players v management.
Last edited: