Svechhammer
THIS is hockey?
- Jun 8, 2017
- 24,115
- 88,629
Of course we will, because its an easy decision
I think this is the beginning of the longer second contract, and a reduction of the veteran almost out of their prime 8 year deal. The next CBA will kind of reverse the current situation, I believe.I'm really interested now to see what happens with the other RFAs. There's a pattern developing here. Larkin signed for 5 years. The Leafs got Nylander for 6, but that negotiation was painful. Matthews went for 5. Meier opted for 4, but is basically guaranteed 8 figures in year 5 on the basis of his QO. Aho was insistent on 5, obviously.
Is anyone going to take a discount this offseason or have we seen the end of the max-term, or close to it, cost-controlled 2nd contract? If it's the latter, it's going to disrupt many roster builds. Be grateful that Francis was able to squeak in a few (Slavin, Pesce) before the landscape potentially changed.
delete please. novacane beat me
delete please. novacane beat me
Yeah this makes sense. We had a thread for each AHL signing and not the single biggest transaction in several years.
I think he just wanted use offre hostile in another thread title.
I would be thrilled if the days of 8 year contracts came to a close. it leads to an inefficient deployment of cap space, which squeezes players year after year. I think it will lead to more interesting team dynamics, more fluid roster situations around the league, and better hockey. cap them at 5 years IMO.I'm really interested now to see what happens with the other RFAs. There's a pattern developing here. Larkin signed for 5 years. The Leafs got Nylander for 6, but that negotiation was painful. Matthews went for 5. Meier opted for 4, but is basically guaranteed 8 figures in year 5 on the basis of his QO. Aho was insistent on 5, obviously.
Is anyone going to take a discount this offseason or have we seen the end of the max-term, or close to it, cost-controlled 2nd contract? If it's the latter, it's going to disrupt many roster builds. Be grateful that Francis was able to squeak in a few (Slavin, Pesce) before the landscape potentially changed.
I don’t know why you’d say “bad pool” to Bergevin for trying to take advantage of a supposed cash-poor team. He’s worried about his team, full stop. I don’t blame him for it, nor do I blame Aho for taking his contract negotiations to the next level.
Anyone who uses that Marchand pic for their avi is a-ok with meYou guys better have 'offre hostile' signs all over when we play in Raleigh.
PS : Off course Aho will stay with you. We ain't all delusional in Montreal. Still, Bergevin's move was fun. Maybe even a wake up call for some GMs.
I'd agree with this if the offer was better. Even Waddell chuckled when he saw the terms. He wasn't trying to take advantage of a cash-poor team, he was just trying to screw with us. If he was really trying to take advantage and get the player, we'd be looking at a Matthews-level offre hostile. He *knew* it wouldn't work, therefore, bad pool.
**** you Dundon. We *just* started this thread.
We just need to chant offer hostile opening night
I got one betterWe just need to chant offre hostile opening night
I like this plan. I'm excited to be a part of it.Keep Aho, then trade for Gusev.
NN/Aho/TT
Gusev/Haula/Svech
Best top 6 since 2006.
We? No. We are not French. We're American, bcuz you're in Amurika, K? Greatest country on the planet.