I was done with him after Game 7 last year and this season has done nothing but reinforce that sentiment. Plays soft, makes insanely bad plays at the worst possible times under the slightest amount of pressure, routinely turns the puck over and/or ices it with his lame stretch passes and now he can't even hit the net anymore with his shot.
He provides absolutely nothing at this point.
Then who will blow game 7 against the Bruins?
i got drilled for even suggesting this on a thread in the summer. he needed to be gone last summer.
I really think one of those bubble team in the West will over pay for Jake. ESP teams that are close to the cap since he is a pure rental.
only a matter of time ,that second goal was as weak as I've seen as far as a forward just b....tch slapping a d manJust blame Jake, most people don’t know the difference
I've been here for over six years and have been very active in every Gardiner thread. I don't remember anything like that, and I'm pretty sure I would have because I would have ripped it to shreds myself.I remember arguing like 6 years ago on here with a bunch of posters about Gardiner.
They were adamant that they wouldn't trade Gardiner straight up for Bergeron.
Zaitsev?How about the game winner, short handed? Who deserves credit for that?
Zaitsev on the first pp?Zaitsev?
Its so sad that Jake has almost all the tools. Just no brain.
Anderson should made the save on that play and our forwards didn’t come low and help out. I credit Jake for trying to absorb that hit, Wilson is a tank. Maybe if we could score a few goals in the first two periods of a game the D would be under less pressure.Gardiner got blown up by the best hitter in the game coming at full speed. It has happened to a lot of d-men over the years, and not because they are soft. He didn't bail to avoid that hit. He tried to make a play with the puck despite what that meant.
The biggest issue with that sequence was that Muzzin had no support for going to help out, and that Muzzin went anyway. Gardiner losing the puck meant that they got the puck behind the net, the two mentioned issues caused a clear passing lane to an unmarked player alone in front of the net. Which seems worse to you?
Gardiner got blown up by the best hitter in the game coming at full speed. It has happened to a lot of d-men over the years, and not because they are soft. He didn't bail to avoid that hit. He tried to make a play with the puck despite what that meant.
The biggest issue with that sequence was that Muzzin had no support for going to help out, and that Muzzin went anyway. Gardiner losing the puck meant that they got the puck behind the net, the two mentioned issues caused a clear passing lane to an unmarked player alone in front of the net. Which seems worse to you?