DFF
Registered User
- Feb 28, 2002
- 22,316
- 6,567
In a way, yes.Just got home. Are we winning?
Yeah, I'll just ignore that they score 1 one goal on the road trip against a team that doesn't play defense and 2 lottery teams.....What a massive overreaction over this game from y'all. Everyone, bar the second line, was able to generate chances but we weren't able to get by Hogberg. Rittich also didn't play spectacular. Thinking that this game is an indication of the Flames not having what a drive to win for whatever is idiotic.
A Hamonic for Hoffman trade would float my goatThis team doesn't have one shooter that makes opposing defenses nervous and it shows
Only if it's grape!!Guys Now that I’ve calmed down a bit and had some time to collect my thoughts I think it’s best that the joint suicide still be on at my place
Mixing up the Kool-Aid now
Sexually.
Good thing the Knights are just as incompetent as us.
It's January and Edmonton and Vancouver are #1 and #2 in the division
Good thing the Knights are just as incompetent as us.
It's January and Edmonton and Vancouver are #1 and #2 in the division
The Flames scored 1 goal except they scored 3 but you just don't want to count 2 of them because...? A narrative? If you're going to act like it's so bad they scored 1 goal in three games when in reality it's 3 in 3 (which isn't great), then you can't include Ottawa because they actually f***ing scored against them you muppet. You can't just discount data because you don't like how it happened.Yeah, I'll just ignore that they score 1 one goal on the road trip against a team that doesn't play defense and 2 lottery teams.....
Yeah the last 2 garbage goals don't count .. game was way over
The Flames scored 1 goal except they scored 3 but you just don't want to count 2 of them because...? A narrative? If you're going to act like it's so bad they scored 1 goal in three games when in reality it's 3 in 3 (which isn't great), then you can't include Ottawa because they actually ****ing scored against them you muppet. You can't just discount data because you don't like how it happened.
What about the game against Edmonton? Where they needed 4, scored 4, and won by 1.LOL...Go ahead and count the 2 junks goals if that make you happy.
I am just making a point that they can only score one goal when they need it.
But count 3 wooh hooh winner.
Doesn't fit a narrative.What about the game against Edmonton? Where they needed 4, scored 4, and won by 1.
What about the game against Edmonton? Where they needed 4, scored 4, and won by 1.
Doesn't fit a narrative.
We rank 25th in goals for per game. You have to be crazy to think they've been good enough so far.
Teams who score less than us.
- Dallas
- San Jose
- Anaheim
- LA
-New Jersey
-Detroit
That's it. Dallas allows the least goals against in the league and is third in their division the others are 5 of the bottom 6 teams in the league.
Monahan amd Gaudreau are on pace for a combined 45 goals. I bet Ovechkin reaches 45 by MarchWe rank 25th in goals for per game. You have to be crazy to think they've been good enough so far.
Teams who score less than us.
- Dallas
- San Jose
- Anaheim
- LA
-New Jersey
-Detroit
That's it. Dallas allows the least goals against in the league and is third in their division the others are 5 of the bottom 6 teams in the league.
Top line not scoringWe rank 25th in goals for per game. You have to be crazy to think they've been good enough so far.
Teams who score less than us.
- Dallas
- San Jose
- Anaheim
- LA
-New Jersey
-Detroit
That's it. Dallas allows the least goals against in the league and is third in their division the others are 5 of the bottom 6 teams in the league.