MuffinMerc
Come watch TV
- Jan 23, 2013
- 4,065
- 0
tied for 8th if you look at win percentage.
Oh that doesn't count!
tied for 8th if you look at win percentage.
it's really the only fair way to look at the standings until the season is over since there is never a day where everyone has played the same number of games.Oh that doesn't count!
Also, call up Roman Horak ASAP. Comeau has no place in the top 9. Hopefully Cammy and Backs are okay though.
Also, call up Roman Horak ASAP. Comeau has no place in the top 9. Hopefully Cammy and Backs are okay though.
With that win, the Flames now sit in 12th, tied with three other teams at 8 points, but have the fewest games played of them. Assuming Nashville holds on to be LA.
I'm very dissapointed in Comeau. When he signed his contract, he said he was going to have a better year. I guess he will never regain his 35+ pt (pace) form
With that win, the Flames now sit in 12th, tied with three other teams at 8 points, but have the fewest games played of them. Assuming Nashville holds on to be LA.
Great game, quick hit.
10-11-24 -> Goal.
Boom, nuff said Stajan lovers.
Great game, quick hit.
10-11-24 -> Goal.
Boom, nuff said Stajan lovers.
How many goals have "10-18-24" scored? Boom, nuff said Stajan hater.
And to add to that, no one ever said it wouldn't work, we all said the exact same thing, don't fix something that isn't broken, why take Staj away from people he's actually gelling with and producing, when you could have them, and Backlund producing on different lines.
How do you guys pronounce Tanguay?
I think it should be Tawn-gay but all the announcers seem to say Tang-gay.
I think a lot of you are short sighted. Not in a bad way, just in a "Our team does no wrong!" way.
Skill goes to skill, set up goes to shooters.
That line would produce even if you had a plug in the middle of the two Czechs, they are: that good. Stajan doesn't serve the line as well as Backlund can, simply because he isn't a really creative, hard nosed, space making player; he drives the net poorly and seems to be a waste of space most of the time. The only thing he can do is win some faceoffs and put the puck on the stick of one of the two offensive players... and not in a "oh ****, nice setup" type of way more of a "Here's the puck, go do something so I can get an assist please" type way.
Skill goes with skill, Backlund's got more skill and can play with higher end players better. Stajan's better off playing with players that are more suited to his playstyle: Re: Glencross/Stemp/Comeau. All three of those guys aren't looking to dazzle, aren't looking to do something sick. They're all looking to fire on the net and drive hard. That's a more defensive line anyways, and I'm happy having those three out against any top line in the NHL.
Now, why I said short sighted. This summer, Stajan's the buyout candidate. I don't think he has a place on this team in the future; and I'm sure mostly anyone outside of some of you die hard Matty/Flames fanatics would agree. So why try and make chemistry between three people when one of them isn't in the cards for the future. Instead, get Backlund to gel with the Czechs. You can get them all under contract for a nice number of years and watch the line go. Calgary's got to clear cap at the end of the year anyways, and I think it starts with the 3.5 million Mr. Stajan gets.
I think a lot of you are short sighted. Not in a bad way, just in a "Our team does no wrong!" way.
Skill goes to skill, set up goes to shooters.
That line would produce even if you had a plug in the middle of the two Czechs, they are: that good. Stajan doesn't serve the line as well as Backlund can, simply because he isn't a really creative, hard nosed, space making player; he drives the net poorly and seems to be a waste of space most of the time. The only thing he can do is win some faceoffs and put the puck on the stick of one of the two offensive players... and not in a "oh ****, nice setup" type of way more of a "Here's the puck, go do something so I can get an assist please" type way.
Skill goes with skill, Backlund's got more skill and can play with higher end players better. Stajan's better off playing with players that are more suited to his playstyle: Re: Glencross/Stemp/Comeau. All three of those guys aren't looking to dazzle, aren't looking to do something sick. They're all looking to fire on the net and drive hard. That's a more defensive line anyways, and I'm happy having those three out against any top line in the NHL.
Now, why I said short sighted. This summer, Stajan's the buyout candidate. I don't think he has a place on this team in the future; and I'm sure mostly anyone outside of some of you die hard Matty/Flames fanatics would agree. So why try and make chemistry between three people when one of them isn't in the cards for the future. Instead, get Backlund to gel with the Czechs. You can get them all under contract for a nice number of years and watch the line go. Calgary's got to clear cap at the end of the year anyways, and I think it starts with the 3.5 million Mr. Stajan gets.
How do you guys pronounce Tanguay?
I think it should be Tawn-gay but all the announcers seem to say Tang-gay.
On a post game interview after he came back to the Flames, he said it's pronounced "tong-gay" so like your first pronunciation but he's used to people calling him "tang-gay". Actually the way he said it, it sounded more like "dong-gay".
While I really want Backlund to succeed and get a lot more ice time, you're understating the importance of winning faceoffs and selling Stajan short; he's been good this season and it's not just because he's playing with Cervenka and Hudler.
Also, don't get your hopes up on Stajan getting bought out. Feaster's already made it pretty clear that that's not going happen. If they really want to get rid of a player, they'll ship them off with a pick, most likely a 2nd, to make it happen.
How do you guys pronounce Tanguay?
I think it should be Tawn-gay but all the announcers seem to say Tang-gay.