I wonder what will happen when all of these major cities wise up and say "we won't/can't afford to give you $250m for a stadium". How many sports franchises across all the major sports would suddenly become insolvent? Probably like half of NHL franchises wouldn't be able to front that cost. You'd see teams, if they owned their existing arenas, try to keep them running as long as possible like with Madison Square Garden. I've always hated how disposable sports venues have been viewed.
Wow.
I was right with you until you mentioned Madison Square Garden. I get your point, but probably the worst example you could agave picked.
MSG has been a bone of contention between its owners and the City of New York for decades -- in fact, for almost as long as it's been built.
MSG has been tax-exempt since 1980 on condition that the Rangers and Knicks play all their home games there -- following a threat by their owners to move the teams to the Meadowlands.
MSG sits on top of Pennsylvania Station and had been long thought to be an impediment to the redevelopment of commuter rail transit in NYC. The battles between the City and MSG seemed never-ending until the Governor of New Yoek and intervened -- I think pretty much on the side of MSG. Gee. I wonder how that happened?
I find it hard to think of MSG as a good corperate citizen.
I do agree with your point, though -- that municipalities should wise-up and not subsidize pro sports.
And I would add that pro sports teams should pay their taxes.