josra33
Registered User
- Aug 11, 2008
- 4,732
- 4,083
That's a pretty narrow definition.Faster, better stickhandler.
Still a pro league with quality players. It's not some beer league
Da Costa really takes me back.No, but the translation from the KHL to the NHL is still a tough hill to climb, regardless of age or experience. I mean, for every Kaprizov there is Gusev, Barabanov, Lehtonen, Shipachyov...
Not to mention in the top 10 of points this year are guys like:
Teemu Hartikainen
Dmitrij Jaskin
Stephane Da Costa
Brian O'Neill
Markus Granlund
Those guys were all elite players in the NHL - right?
Kaprizov played with ppg+ level players on the powerplay?Except on the PP where 1/4 of his total points came from. Robertson had far better 5 on 5 stats that Kaprizov.
No surprise Ned is here. He's on the third axis of transcendence right now. Alex Nedeljkovic moves in anti-planar reality (or prime-planar reality, shouts to my qmech nerds who really buy Frisch-Hayes.) While goalies like Thomas Greiss or Andrei Vasilevskiy see the game from an x and o perspective, Alex has vision of the omega and delta factors surrounding any given hockey event. There's a reason Alex was able to lead Martin Necas to the 2019 Calder Cup. Put simply, Nedeljkovic is visuospatial jazz. Think of Ornette Coleman or Buddy Rich, not Henrik Lundqvist or Tuukka Rask. The dorian stylings of a Eric Dolphy better describe Ned's game than a monotone listing-off of conventional goalie skills. Puck handles? When you're in constant tune with the precise Hz pitch of the ice like Nedeljkovic, English words like "good save" cannot encapsulate even a fractoid of the scientific and metaphysical majesty of Alex.
I think Kaprizov wins pretty easily, he just had too much buzz. I also think they should lower the max age to 22. It's common for rookies to play between 18 & 20.
I think Kaprizov wins pretty easily, he just had too much buzz. I also think they should lower the max age to 22. It's common for rookies to play between 18 & 20.
He scored 1/4 of all his points while having an extra attacker. 5 on 5 stats are a better measuring stick. Sorry to break it to you.Kaprizov played with ppg+ level players on the powerplay?
Yeah, penalizing a player for being good on the powerplay seems weird to me. Sure, he got a lot of points on the powerplay, but he was still helping our team and scoring for us.He scored 1/4 of all his points while having an extra attacker. 5 on 5 stats are a better measuring stick. Sorry to break it to you.
He started out great in his 1st game, and kept it up for quite a while. there was a brief lull later on in the season, but Kap has looked like a 1st line difference maker from the moment he stepped into the NHL. The only thing limiting him was the quality of his linemates(i.e. Victor Rask, Nick Bjugstad), and other teams starting to play him exceptionally physically, though those that did so found out that he is really stout and won't back down.The KHL detractor is overblown. Kaprizov didn’t start the season all that hot, he got much better as the season went on because he acclimated to the North American game quick.
He scored 1/4 of all his points while having an extra attacker. 5 on 5 stats are a better measuring stick. Sorry to break it to you.
all high end players get 1/4th or more points on the PP. Mcdavid got 34% on the PP.He scored 1/4 of all his points while having an extra attacker. 5 on 5 stats are a better measuring stick. Sorry to break it to you.
all high end players get 1/4th or more points on the PP. Mcdavid got 34% on the PP.
Maybe you should ask why wasn't Robertson better on the PP?
People talk about the .1 5v5 P/60 as a massive gap(despite much better linemates), then write off Kaprizovs 1.2 gap in powerplay P/60.
Maybe Robertson should have been better at the PP....
A quarter of your points isn't a large number. Pretty much all the top scorers score at least that and McDavid and Draisaitl were over 35%. Kaprizov was tied with MacKinnon for 11th in 5v5 points with 34, 1 more than Robertson. Robertson played 4 fewer games and 66 fewer minutes at 5v5, but the difference is pretty much negligible. Robertson was 9th in the league in 5v5 P/60 at 2.83 while Kaprizov was 14th at 2.66. 5v5 points are in some ways more valuable because PP scoring can be more influenced by role and system, but it's also still valuable. Kaprizov ran the Wild PP, he wasn't a passenger, so ignoring it is foolish. A large PP disparity is more valuable than a small 5v5 one.
Was the focus of the PP would be more accurate.Kaprizov ran the Wild's PP from the slot?
Kaprizov ran the Wild's PP from the slot?