RyJo had good production but was never the player his point totals said he was.
He was never a true 1C in the league but instead was a good 2C who was buoyed by playing with first line talent and with first line minutes. He's always been a fine player but was never what you are making him out to be. He was a fine 55-65pt per season player that filled the role but he he was never an ideal solution for Nashville/ Columbus.
Calling Kotkaneimi someone who has more potential than RyJo isn't some crazy thought, it's reasonable for sure. Calling Kotkaneimi a sure bet 85pt player is a stretch for sure.
I think Kotkaneimi will be better than RyJo was, I'm not sure Kotkaneimi will be an ideal 1C.
I disagree. RyJo has flaws, and his work ethic was questionable, but his talent was always great. The guy has averaged 63 points a year from 2013-2014 up to 2018-2019. He played a massive role leading the Preds to the finals and had he not been injured, they might have won the cup. He was most definitely a key role for the Preds with his playoffs performance. The Preds had nothing after him in the center depth.
But the poster said his peak will be a lot higher, which is essentially 85-90 points. So yes, it's a crazy thought.
So if RyJo wasn't an ideal 1C and you aren't sure if KK will be one either, why do you think KK will be better? They both share similar traits in that they are close to the same height, drafted highly, great playmakers, have good shots, really struggled with athleticism(most notably skating)...etc
I see him being a lot closer to RyJo rather than Aho/Barkov/Draisaitl/Kopitar/Getzlaf/Scheifele. He's not going to be a RyJo clone, but I see him being a similar type of player which is what I initially said.