IronMarshal
Registered User
Does anyone want to address his lack of forechecking and sustained even strength pressure in the offensive zone?
Evan Oppenheimer's Betweenness analytics are a major topic today on /r/hockey.
Here are the 2018-19 USNTDP team's Betweenness metrics. Jack ranks third in 5-on-5 Betweeness, behind Trevor Zegras and Sean Farrell. The visual observations corroborate this weakness of Hughes' game at even strength:
You seem intent on portraying Hughes as infallible.
Not only was he outplayed by Kaapo Kakko, but Jack was much weaker in several areas, including the most important ones: even strength offense and defensive reads. In the first example, he literally lunged at the puck carrier and took himself out of the play, giving the player he was mean to cover a clear path to the net. The overarching theme is that Jack Hughes, despite his skill and speed, does not recognize what he needs to do at this level and is limited by this lack of intuition.
He lacks the elite-level intuition, so all he has are speed and some puck skills.
I've preached this in the past: do not draft for skill over hockey IQ. The "tools but no toolbox players" are high-risk; the "tools but small toolbox" players are limited in what they can do.
This reply is in general to all of the anti Jack Hughes nonsense on here. There is nothing to be concerned with as he will be playing for Philly. You don't have to worry about your team drafting this awful prospect.
The Flyers will happily plug him in with Farabee and race off to win some cups