C Frederik Gauthier (2013, 21st, TOR) II

Captain Timo

Registered User
Dec 4, 2015
2,319
1
If I remember correctly, most people wanted Shinkaruk who is already on to his 2nd franchise. Granted, we'd be ecstatic if we chose Theodore over him.


Yup. I remember wanting Burakovsky, but oh well. It happens, not much to sulk about. Like I said, the #21 pick has a pretty slim chance of being an impact NHLer
 

Mad Brills*

Guest
I remember most leafs fans were sad that mantha was a gone a pick before.
 

Hero

Uncle Leo
Jul 2, 2009
20,826
0
heropuck.wordpress.com
I know this thread's been dormant for 4 months, but wasn't sure where else to post this.

Using http://www.behindthenet.ca/projecting_to_nhl.php for league equivalencies it's interesting to see how early Gauthier plateud.

Gauthier PPG
12/13 - 0.967 PPG Q -> 0.27 PPG NHL
13/14 - 0.962 PPG Q -> 0.27 PPG NHL
14/15 - 0.865 PPG Q -> 0.24 PPG NHL
15/16 - 0.321 PPG A -> 0.22 PPG NHL

The NHL PPG has been steadily declining, and is down a bit more this year. But if I'm a betting man I say Gauthier is likely a 0.2 PPG in the NHL, which works out to a 15 point ish C.

Seems like at best he'll be a 15 point 4th line C, which plays a lot of PK minutes, and hopefully becomes a faceoff stud. Which is pretty much exactly what David Steckel was.
 

TeddyBare

Registered User
Jul 28, 2016
4,226
3,149
Mississauga, Ontario
I know this thread's been dormant for 4 months, but wasn't sure where else to post this.

Using http://www.behindthenet.ca/projecting_to_nhl.php for league equivalencies it's interesting to see how early Gauthier plateud.

Gauthier PPG
12/13 - 0.967 PPG Q -> 0.27 PPG NHL
13/14 - 0.962 PPG Q -> 0.27 PPG NHL
14/15 - 0.865 PPG Q -> 0.24 PPG NHL
15/16 - 0.321 PPG A -> 0.22 PPG NHL

The NHL PPG has been steadily declining, and is down a bit more this year. But if I'm a betting man I say Gauthier is likely a 0.2 PPG in the NHL, which works out to a 15 point ish C.

Seems like at best he'll be a 15 point 4th line C, which plays a lot of PK minutes, and hopefully becomes a faceoff stud. Which is pretty much exactly what David Steckel was.


I still can't believe he was ranked 8th by NHL Central Scouting

Ahead of Bo Horvat, Max Domi, Shea Theodore. :shakehead:shakehead
 

ponder

Registered User
Jul 11, 2007
16,976
6,325
Vancouver
Has a shot to make the NHL, but can't see him being more than a 4C. Steckel is a pretty good comparison.

Even discounting our rookies (Matthews, Marner, Nylander, Brown, Hyman and Soshnikov), he's nowhere close to the Leafs best forward prospect. I personally have him below Kapanen, Leivo, Leipsic, Timashov, Bracco, Johnson, Grundstrom, Korshkov, etc. I wish him well, but his upside is quite limited, not sure why he gets so much attention.
 

BDizzle*

Registered User
Jul 7, 2010
1,136
1
Ontario
As many have said, he never was that offensively gifted; and that hasn't improved throughout his stints in the AHL. He does seem quite reliable defensively and for that reason I think he can carve out a role as a 4th line center.

In terms of being compared to Steckel, that is a comparison I do agree with. Steckel was also a beast on the face-off dot. I don't know if Gauthier will be as good as Steckel in the NHL in face-offs, but if so; he can carve out a respectable career. Perhaps being a bit of a journeyman along the way like Steckel was too.
 

93LEAFS

Registered User
Nov 7, 2009
34,034
21,133
Toronto
As many have said, he never was that offensively gifted; and that hasn't improved throughout his stints in the AHL. He does seem quite reliable defensively and for that reason I think he can carve out a role as a 4th line center.

In terms of being compared to Steckel, that is a comparison I do agree with. Steckel was also a beast on the face-off dot. I don't know if Gauthier will be as good as Steckel in the NHL in face-offs, but if so; he can carve out a respectable career. Perhaps being a bit of a journeyman along the way like Steckel was too.
He was never able to take that next step offensively. I'm just hoping for a solid 4th liner who can flip the ice at this point and eat tough minutes. Also, being a key PKer would be a great addition to that. I think him, Martin and Hyman could be a pretty good 4th line.
 

WTFMAN99

Registered User
Jun 17, 2009
33,192
11,204
He can skate a bit better then Steckel, although he's going to need to get better at face-offs, Steckel was a beast.
 

HockeyNightInBelfast

HockeyNightInBelfast
Mar 28, 2011
700
1
Belfast
www.facebook.com
Whilst Steckel is a close comparison, it would only be on faceoff prowess alone.

Freddy has elite hockey sense on the defensive side of the game & is not a one trick pony w/ just faceoff ability.
He has gold medal pedigree, the organisation is high on him & previous coaches have all been high on him for what he is, not for what his potential is.

He is a 4th line centre forever & there has to be some merit in having that position locked down for the next 5+ years especially given that is normally a DEFAULT position.

In this case, it's the position that Freddy was made for. :yo:
 

Grandrift145

Registered User
Jan 23, 2009
2,224
24
Uptop
Whilst Steckel is a close comparison, it would only be on faceoff prowess alone.

Freddy has elite hockey sense on the defensive side of the game & is not a one trick pony w/ just faceoff ability.
He has gold medal pedigree, the organisation is high on him & previous coaches have all been high on him for what he is, not for what his potential is.

He is a 4th line centre forever & there has to be some merit in having that position locked down for the next 5+ years especially given that is normally a DEFAULT position.

In this case, it's the position that Freddy was made for. :yo:

The only thing elite about Freddy is size
 

Walshy7

Registered User
Sep 18, 2016
25,326
9,343
Toronto
The only thing elite about Freddy is size

he is pretty close to elite defensively, hockey Canada thought so twice as well. He will be a 4th line pk C for us I don't doubt it. His skating has really improved a lot and he is pretty fast, he is great defensively
 

Jimmy Firecracker

They Fired Sheldon!
Mar 30, 2010
36,472
36,145
Mississauga
Gauthier is just a classic Burke/Nonis pick :laugh:

It was such a reactionary pick. Leafs couldn't hold the lead against the Bruins in game 7, so they drafted a defensive specialist C with their first pick.

I still have hope for Gauthier to be a solid 4C. I like 93Leafs idea of a Martin-Gauthier-Hyman 4th line, and having him on the PK with the likes of Hyman and Brown would be nice. Leafs have done well recently developing solid penalty killers.

Him being a PK and defensive specialist would also diversify our future Centre core.

Matthews-Nylander-Kadri-Gauthier

Plus we get the bonus right to say our C depth is all homegrown and drafted. :D
 

Finnish your Czech

J'aime Les offres hostiles
Nov 25, 2009
64,457
1,986
Toronto
It was such a reactionary pick. Leafs couldn't hold the lead against the Bruins in game 7, so they drafted a defensive specialist C with their first pick.

I still have hope for Gauthier to be a solid 4C. I like 93Leafs idea of a Martin-Gauthier-Hyman 4th line, and having him on the PK with the likes of Hyman and Brown would be nice. Leafs have done well recently developing solid penalty killers.

Him being a PK and defensive specialist would also diversify our future Centre core.

Matthews-Nylander-Kadri-Gauthier

Plus we get the bonus right to say our C depth is all homegrown and drafted. :D

I imagine they figured he had second line offensive potential. Being PPG in your draft year isn't THAT bad. His PPG was similar to the following players in their draft years: Bo Horvat, Lawson Crouse, Curtis Lazar, Radek Faksa, Tom Wilson and more. Not that those are all elite players, but they were drafted in spots higher (or much higher) than where Gauthier was drafted (21st ovr).
 

PatrikOverAuston

Laine > Matthews
Jun 22, 2016
3,573
989
Winnipeg
Edmonton is a bit weak on prospect centers, so I'd take him in return for one of our 12,000 left handed defensemen. I agree that he can be a respectable fourth line guy; I mean, Mark Letestu had 18 points in the AHL the same age, and he turned out fine. Sometimes it takes a slow, gradual climb and a couple of stops to realize a player's potential.
 

Wolves

Registered User
Jan 25, 2016
200
0
Gauthier is just a classic Burke/Nonis pick :laugh:

The truculence on this kid though, haha.

Some good points being made here. Unfortunate that his offensive game hasn't developed as well as we'd hoped when selected so high but hopefully he can be an effective role player. Saw him play in the World Juniors but the only time he saw increased minutes (that I noticed) was when we were up on Denmark 8-0.
 

Aceboogie

Registered User
Aug 25, 2012
32,649
3,896
Still cant believe so many believed a low offense center in the CHL could suddenly morph into this shutdown monster depth center in the NHL. You still need to have some offensive ability to do that in the NHL. Guys like that in the NHL still had good junior numbers

Same goes for defensive low scoring D. Guys like Tinordi/Musil/Reinhart/Gauhtier werent a matter of "if" theyll be busts, it was when
 

Aceboogie

Registered User
Aug 25, 2012
32,649
3,896
Edmonton is a bit weak on prospect centers, so I'd take him in return for one of our 12,000 left handed defensemen. I agree that he can be a respectable fourth line guy; I mean, Mark Letestu had 18 points in the AHL the same age, and he turned out fine. Sometimes it takes a slow, gradual climb and a couple of stops to realize a player's potential.

Letestu had 46 points (24 goals) in 37 games in NCAA and ripped up Jr.A before that. Jumped to 61 points in AHL after his rookie year, Gauthier has 4 points
 

Aceboogie

Registered User
Aug 25, 2012
32,649
3,896
he is pretty close to elite defensively, hockey Canada thought so twice as well. He will be a 4th line pk C for us I don't doubt it. His skating has really improved a lot and he is pretty fast, he is great defensively

Team Canada has picked numerous future non NHLers to round out bottom 6 on that team
 
Sep 18, 2009
9,083
4,466
Still cant believe so many believed a low offense center in the CHL could suddenly morph into this shutdown monster depth center in the NHL. You still need to have some offensive ability to do that in the NHL. Guys like that in the NHL still had good junior numbers

Same goes for defensive low scoring D. Guys like Tinordi/Musil/Reinhart/Gauhtier werent a matter of "if" theyll be busts, it was when

Wow

Ruthless

But true
 

BoredBrandonPridham

Registered User
Aug 9, 2011
7,573
4,061
Whilst Steckel is a close comparison, it would only be on faceoff prowess alone.

Freddy has elite hockey sense on the defensive side of the game & is not a one trick pony w/ just faceoff ability.
He has gold medal pedigree, the organisation is high on him & previous coaches have all been high on him for what he is, not for what his potential is.

He is a 4th line centre forever & there has to be some merit in having that position locked down for the next 5+ years especially given that is normally a DEFAULT position.

In this case, it's the position that Freddy was made for. :yo:

"Gold medal pedigree" is the kind of attribute people reach to when they try to justify a bad contract or draft pick. Right up there with Character Guy, Has A Cup Ring, Grit and Heart.

Just remember, Ben Smith hasn't been bad enough to warrant calling up Fred. So are we *sure* Fred has elite hockey sense defensively, or, is that just his strongest attribute?
 

Albus Dumbledore

Master of Death
Mar 28, 2015
9,010
2,670
"Gold medal pedigree" is the kind of attribute people reach to when they try to justify a bad contract or draft pick. Right up there with Character Guy, Has A Cup Ring, Grit and Heart.

Just remember, Ben Smith hasn't been bad enough to warrant calling up Fred. So are we *sure* Fred has elite hockey sense defensively, or, is that just his strongest attribute?

That's not true at all, babs loved gauthier at camp and almost made the team outright.
But he still had some room to grow and improve hence why hes not on the roster.
Your analogy is like why nylander didnt play for most of the leafs last year cause the scrubs were good enough or better then him.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad