LeafalCrusader
Registered User
Johnson and Eichel always go into God mode against us. Ugh. This would have been a good game to give Freddy the night off and let McBackup get an extra start.
Prior to Saturdays game. Leafs had 8 games left, Boston had 9 games left, and Leafs needed 8 points more to catch Boston.
Something like this would have had to happen...
Leafs would have to go 6-2 = 12 points
Boston would have to go 2-7= 4 points
How is that even remotely realistic?
The way Eichel was celebrating you would've thought he was scoring game 7 Stanley Cup Playoff goals.
In each of the posts I've quoted of yours, I'm not sure what you're asking/arguing, but I'll give it a whirl...
I don't believe Babcock has an eye on Boston as much as he has an eye on readying his club for the playoffs. Thus far, Freddie Andersen has started 62 games this season. NHL number starting goalies typically start between 60 and 70 games a season. With six or seven games left, Babcock has his starter well within the typical range of games started for a starting NHL goalie.
What Toronto can control is their on-ice play. What Toronto can't control is Boston's. What Toronto can control is how they approach each player's ice-time as the playoffs approach. What Toronto can't control is how other teams (positively or negatively) allocate ice-time for their respective teams. For example, Tampa started Louis Domingue against the Yotes and the Bolts lost. One would think, starting your backup on the Tampa Bay Lightning when playing the Arizona Coyotes should equate to an automatic win. Apparently...it doesn't. Now is that a demonstration of poor player management or good player management? Could it be, within the greater context of trying to remained focused on the playoffs an aspect of NHL clubs that the close they get to the playoffs, the lesser lights of any particular season up their game in order to redeem what's been lost? I think so. It happens all the time.
But the crux of the matter is that neither Jon Cooper nor Mike Babcock are incompetent, stupid NHL head coaches. They are mindful of their respective teams' needs as equally as they are each of their player's needs.
So the thought that Babcock started Andersen with a calculated mindset of catching Boston doesn't seem to overlay naturally if we consider a number of other necessary elements i.e. NHL competition writ large. What does seem consistent is a team, like Toronto or Tampa, focusing on working out team kinks and preserving the game shape that the season of hard work has yielded in order to be playoff tempo ready when it swings around against whatever team they have to play against.
That's what seems realistic to me.
update:
Fred: .917
Reims: .914
Not sure where you got this from but according to hockey reference, Andersen is still at .918 (link below).
From a quick glance at the stats shown here, I see that among goalies with at least 40 starts this season Andersen's .918 SV% (same as he had last season) has him tied for 9th with Jones, Varlamov and Rask. Or to put it another way, he is a bona fide #1 starting NHL goalie. I'm pretty sure Boston is more than comforable heading into the playoffs with Rask and in the same way, I'm more than comfortable heading into the playoffs with Andersen. I don't expect him to win the cup for us on his own but I do think he's gonna be good for us.
2017-18 NHL Goalie Statistics | Hockey-Reference.com
The way Eichel was celebrating you would've thought he was scoring game 7 Stanley Cup Playoff goals.
Reimer has a shutout last night
Actually, studies on this has shown that shot amount has generally no effect, but that quite a few goaltenders perform better with a bigger workload.People critiquing freddy's save % seem to think that whatever % you get against a normal number of shots should hold as you face an absolute avalanche like he has. Spoiler alert: the more shots against, the harder it is to maintain a higher %.
The way Eichel was celebrating you would've thought he was scoring game 7 Stanley Cup Playoff goals.
I don't know. I don't quite like the crap he gets on here still at times, but he was at best a decent goaltender who struggled to play a starters workload. I have no idea how people still get so hung up on it. If Andersen had struggled and Reimer went on to show he's a starter, I could have understood it. That hasn't even come near being true.how did reamer get such a cult following?
I don't know. I don't quite like the crap he gets on here still at times, but he was at best a decent goaltender who struggled to play a starters workload. I have no idea how people still get so hung up on it. If Andersen had struggled and Reimer went on to show he's a starter, I could have understood it. That hasn't even come near being true.