Proposal: Bruins Trade Proposals III

Status
Not open for further replies.

maxl7

Registered User
Jun 14, 2017
1,442
1,445
I was all for buying low on him before this video.. Which yes I'd say his stock just dropped even more.

But you have to really start to question his character after adding this to his list right below his falling out in Colorado, no?

No.

I guarantee every player in the league has said worse things about a coach.
 

maxl7

Registered User
Jun 14, 2017
1,442
1,445
I like the Heinen-Backes-Bjork 3rd line we rolled with last night. I think we should keep that line together to let it build some consistency and chemistry.

To me, the issue is the 2nd line. Krejci and DeBrusk showed they can play well together last year, we just need to figure out what to do with that RW spot. I've been touting Carter from the Kings, as he could play center or RW, but I also wonder if we could perhaps get Toffoli from them. One of the young D and a pick should get it done.

The Kings aren't trading a forward. They're looking to add to their forward corps, not subtract.
 

JCRO

At least I'm safe inside my mind
Sponsor
Mar 8, 2011
8,858
10,065
No.

I guarantee every player in the league has said worse things about a coach.

Kid was a problem child in Colorado. Somewhat lacked evidence on exactly what happened there. But he made it pretty well known he wasn't happy.

Now this in Ottawa.

Not sure how you can say you're not at least questioning his character after this?
 

BruinDust

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
24,642
22,456
Kid was a problem child in Colorado. Somewhat lacked evidence on exactly what happened there. But he made it pretty well known he wasn't happy.

Now this in Ottawa.

Not sure how you can say you're not at least questioning his character after this?

I think it says more about the Assistant Coach than it does Duchene.
 

Mainehockey33

Powerplay Specialist
Jul 15, 2011
10,225
7,764
Maine
Kid was a problem child in Colorado. Somewhat lacked evidence on exactly what happened there. But he made it pretty well known he wasn't happy.

Now this in Ottawa.

Not sure how you can say you're not at least questioning his character after this?
Definitely. I didn’t want anything to do with him when I heard he gave up on Colorado for half a season. I made some posts saying I’d rather have Spooner than Duchene. Recently I changed my mind on him because he started playing better for Ottawa so I thought he turned a corner, I guess not. I don’t know if I’d be completely against him as a really cheap rental, but nothing long term.
 

Oates2Neely

Registered User
Jan 19, 2010
19,566
13,864
Massachusetts
I was all for buying low on him before this video.. Which yes I'd say his stock just dropped even more.

But you have to really start to question his character after adding this to his list right below his falling out in Colorado, no?
I’d chalk that up to guys being guys. He doesn’t have the character of a Chara or Bergeron but then again not many do.

He’s fast and can score. I’d take a chance
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordon Lightfoot

JCRO

At least I'm safe inside my mind
Sponsor
Mar 8, 2011
8,858
10,065
I think it says more about the Assistant Coach than it does Duchene.
I understand that.

And the rest of it was sort of locker room talk although they were ripping into their own team pretty good as well. Not just the coach (powerplay, penalty kill).

All Im saying is Duchene seems to be starting to finding himself on the negative side of things within his teams.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Strafer

Sheppy

Registered User
Nov 23, 2011
56,915
60,288
The Arctic
Funny but guys like Virtanen, Anderson and Bennett were dismissed as not being worth one of our kid wingers but they all have performed better than I ever would have imagined. Bennett moreso his physical game, but the other two have some pop.
All 3 are guys I wanted them to push for, I was shot down on basically everything, lol.

I guarantee you Anderson finishes with more goals than Heinen, Bjork and Donato put together.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Strafer

maxl7

Registered User
Jun 14, 2017
1,442
1,445
They're dead last in the league right now. They'd be fools to not explore any avenue that would bring in some new, young talent.

They're fools for thinking that they don't need to rebuild. I'm not debating their foolishness, just the reality of their misguided attempt to compete.
 

maxl7

Registered User
Jun 14, 2017
1,442
1,445
I understand that.

And the rest of it was sort of locker room talk although they were ripping into their own team pretty good as well. Not just the coach (powerplay, penalty kill).

All Im saying is Duchene seems to be starting to finding himself on the negative side of things within his teams.

Which means it's a perfect opportunity to exploit a market inefficiency and get him cheap. While the rest of the Old Boys Club frowns and furrows their brow at his character and compete and all sorts of other nonsense, the Bruins could strike and get some on-ice talent that makes a difference for a good price.

They won't, though.
 

JCRO

At least I'm safe inside my mind
Sponsor
Mar 8, 2011
8,858
10,065
Which means it's a perfect opportunity to exploit a market inefficiency and get him cheap. While the rest of the Old Boys Club frowns and furrows their brow at his character and compete and all sorts of other nonsense, the Bruins could strike and get some on-ice talent that makes a difference for a good price.

They won't, though.
LOL what?

And no they wont. Cause Ottawa wont trade within their division.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Strafer

maxl7

Registered User
Jun 14, 2017
1,442
1,445
LOL what?

And no they wont. Cause Ottawa wont trade within their division.

What is confusing about that statement? You don't think NHL GMs are an Old Boys Club?

And Ottawa might not trade within their division, but it doesn't hurt to try.
 

Sheppy

Registered User
Nov 23, 2011
56,915
60,288
The Arctic
Forwards: (Goals and Shots)
1st Line

David Pastrnak (12) - 58
Patrice Bergeron (7) - 47
Brad Marchand (5) - 31
Total = 24 on 136

2nd Line

Jake Debrusk (3) - 30
David Krejci (2) - 15
Anders Bjork (1) - 11
Total = 6 on 56


3rd Line
Joakim Nordstrom (2) - 28
Danton Heinen (0) - 14
David Backes (0) - 13
Total = 2 on 55


4th Line
Sean Kuraly (1) - 24
Chris Wagner (1) - 22
Noel Accairi (0) - 17
Total = 2 on 63

Extra:

Ryan Donato (1) - 12

This should really tell you the state of this team. They need secondary help, big time. Heinen, Bjork or Donato should be moved by Xmas if there's no improvement.

Also, the 4th line has more shots on net than the 2nd and 3rd line.
 
Last edited:

BruinDust

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
24,642
22,456
Funny but guys like Virtanen, Anderson and Bennett were dismissed as not being worth one of our kid wingers but they all have performed better than I ever would have imagined. Bennett moreso his physical game, but the other two have some pop.

Half this board wouldn't of traded Zach Senyshyn this past summer for Virtanen, arguing about some perceived greater upside in Senyshyn when the reality was Senyshyn's AHL numbers were only slightly better than Virtanen's NHL numbers.
 

JCRO

At least I'm safe inside my mind
Sponsor
Mar 8, 2011
8,858
10,065
What is confusing about that statement? You don't think NHL GMs are an Old Boys Club?

And Ottawa might not trade within their division, but it doesn't hurt to try.
I thought you were saying I was apart of some Old Boys Club :laugh:

I think Duchene is definitely going to be moved. Just not here IMO.

What they gave up for him alone has already scorched them. Now this comes out to the public.
 

Sheppy

Registered User
Nov 23, 2011
56,915
60,288
The Arctic
Half this board wouldn't of traded Zach Senyshyn this past summer for Virtanen, arguing about some perceived greater upside in Senyshyn when the reality was Senyshyn's AHL numbers were only slightly better than Virtanen's NHL numbers.
Virtanen was an absolute low risk, high reward type trade. Something they really should have looked into.
 

gumgum

Registered User
Oct 15, 2017
772
510
Virtanen was an absolute low risk, high reward type trade. Something they really should have looked into.
Was there ever a time that it was rumored the Canucks were motivated to possibly move him? My recollection of his time there is actually that a lot of fans wanted him traded but that the organization itself always showed too much faith in him for their liking even when he was demoted.

Interesting comparison with him and Bjork, he put on like 15 pounds to play at a heavier weight I think his second year pro and it proved more prohibitive than anything. I really feel like the weight Bjork has put on is having a similar effect, and also that he's trying to change himself stylistically too much. Idk.
 
  • Like
Reactions: maxl7

maxl7

Registered User
Jun 14, 2017
1,442
1,445
Before we go down this silly road how about you provide your definition of a NHL GM Old Boys Club.

An insular network of former pros and "guys who played the game". Hockey will change eventually and more and more "outsiders" will get their shot just like we've seen in the other major sports, but for now it's still incredibly hard to break into unless you were a player or are related to a former player/executive.

All of this is beside my main point which is that a lot of GMs (and hell, fans, too) put too much stock in intangible attributes that have nothing to do with on-ice play. That's something that can be exploited to bring in players who are perceived to be flawed but can actually contribute where it matters.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad