Super Cake
Registered User
- Jun 24, 2013
- 30,998
- 6,424
Anderson confirmed as the starter.
Anderson's record against the bruins is horrible. I don't have a good feeling about this game at all.
Anderson confirmed as the starter.
Anderson's record against the bruins is horrible. I don't have a good feeling about this game at all.
I'm more worried about the train wreck team defence.
Amazing how quickly the attitude towards Andy has turned.
Hope the team in front of him shows up tonight.
Right? If this doesn't improve, it's not going to matter who starts in net.
Lehner has played behind the same defence, but has put up better numbers than Anderson.
This is precisely why Anderson shouldn't start.
Because if we lose, idiots will blame him for it.
Yes, because people with a different opinion then you are idiots.
If it's an idiotic opinion, sure.
I can say the same about your opinions then if you are going to start calling people idiots.
If it's an idiotic opinion, sure.
If the team were playing well and Andy was single-handedly crapping the bed, great.
He didn't play great against Philly, but the team in front of him played worse.
Keep in mind, I want Lehner to start. But not because Andy isn't capable of putting up a good performance.
Get real, team sucked big time but Andy sucked as much as them, I don't give a **** if he makes a nice save once it's 2-0 or 4-0, I want him to keep us in the game, he didn't, he was bad, he let 2 ****ing wrap arounds and a weak slapper from the far high slot (Methot sucked there too), and seriously, if you are a coach, why would you throw Andy to the wolves like that when the other G is hot as fire right now? makes absolutely no sense
There must be some logic that Paul sees that I'm missing.
I'm more worried about the train wreck team defence.
Andy has kept us in games that we shouldn't be in FAR more often than he's been single-handedly responsible for losing a game.
It's sad that we rely so much on our goalies to keep us in games when we're playing like ***** that once they don't keep us in a game... they're suddenly at fault for losses.
Like I said, I agree that it's a dumb decision.
But this Anderson = Automatic Loss is pretty silly IMO.
Andy stands on his head, we lose 1-0, and you'll still find people in here saying they should have started Lehner.
With the way the team has been playing in its own end, allowing 1 goal against seems like a pipe dream though.
I'd rather play Lehner tonight due to consistency.
I can say the same about your opinions then if you are going to start calling people idiots.
And this team and its crappy defence can't afford average in nets.
Andy has kept us in games that we shouldn't be in FAR more often than he's been single-handedly responsible for losing a game.
It's sad that we rely so much on our goalies to keep us in games when we're playing like ***** that once they don't keep us in a game... they're suddenly at fault for losses.
Give Andy another soft start versus Columbus or Philly (think we play them again next .