mibs
Registered User
- Feb 6, 2013
- 146
- 0
Hi all,
First of all, I am a Habs fan so please don't hold back on the insults and hurtful comments
My question is what will the Bruins do in the future regarding their goaldenters.
With the fallout with Thomas, I see Rask as the unanimous Starter and possibly the long term solution. Khudobin as Rask's backup since I don't believe he would be able to surpass him on the depth chart. But now things get a little intereseting with the drafting of Malcom Subban.
Knowing that goaltenders are incredibly hard to predict, but if all of these goalies achieve their potential, we would have Rask as a starter, SUbban as a starter, and Kudobin as an NHL goalie.
Now considering that both Rask and Subban haven't established themselves as the unanimous long term goalie in the near future ( Probably 3-4 year from not at least), the Bruins might want to hang on to them both and roll them as a 1A and 1B type of situation, ala Vancouver is doing currently. But we know that starting golatenders want to start and might look elsewhere for the opportunity, leading to an eventual trade.
Should the Bruins bank of Subban's potential and trade a proven Rask for a Proven nhl player, or should they gamble on subban and the return he nets them(Personally feels it would be a top 4 dman or top 6 foward prospect with similar upside)?
Thanks
First of all, I am a Habs fan so please don't hold back on the insults and hurtful comments
My question is what will the Bruins do in the future regarding their goaldenters.
With the fallout with Thomas, I see Rask as the unanimous Starter and possibly the long term solution. Khudobin as Rask's backup since I don't believe he would be able to surpass him on the depth chart. But now things get a little intereseting with the drafting of Malcom Subban.
Knowing that goaltenders are incredibly hard to predict, but if all of these goalies achieve their potential, we would have Rask as a starter, SUbban as a starter, and Kudobin as an NHL goalie.
Now considering that both Rask and Subban haven't established themselves as the unanimous long term goalie in the near future ( Probably 3-4 year from not at least), the Bruins might want to hang on to them both and roll them as a 1A and 1B type of situation, ala Vancouver is doing currently. But we know that starting golatenders want to start and might look elsewhere for the opportunity, leading to an eventual trade.
Should the Bruins bank of Subban's potential and trade a proven Rask for a Proven nhl player, or should they gamble on subban and the return he nets them(Personally feels it would be a top 4 dman or top 6 foward prospect with similar upside)?
Thanks