Injury Report: Bruins ‘23 - ‘24 Injured List

Gee Wally

Old, Grumpy Moderator
Sponsor
Feb 27, 2002
74,662
89,781
HF retirement home

Coach Jim Montgomery revealed after his team’s optional skate at Warrior Ice Arena that Andrew Peekeis “week to week” with an injury, taking one of the team’s sturdiest defensemen out of the equation.

Peeke, who will not travel with his teammates to Toronto for Games 3 and 4, played just 10:20 in Monday’s 3-2 loss in Game 2, exiting in the second period when a shot from Tyler Bertuzzi struck him in the hand.


Another stay-at-home defensive option could be Derek Forbort, who will travel with the team. Forbort, once seemingly lost for the season after undergoing surgery following the trade deadline, is “day to day,” per Montgomery, but won’t play in Game 3.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raleighfern

whatsbruin

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
7,493
2,366
Central, NY
what happened to brandon carlo. Did not come out for overtime in game 5 ?
Wow, no word ?
Not at practice today. The article also said "Even if Carlo does suit up against the Leafs on Thursday, he is unlikely to offer much in the way of offensive production" which is funny considering he is the only Defensmen to have a goal in the series.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lady Rhian

I am Bettman

Registered User
May 23, 2022
401
940
Wow, no word ?
Not at practice today. The article also said "Even if Carlo does suit up against the Leafs on Thursday, he is unlikely to offer much in the way of offensive production" which is funny considering he is the only Defensmen to have a goal in the series.
Also funny because when has anybody expected Brandon Carlo of all people to produce offensively.
 

JoeIsAStud

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
11,716
5,602
Visit site
If we are hanging our hat on whether Brandon Fricking Carlo is in or out of the lineup then we have more problems than I even thought

Nah don't need one of our top 2 defensive defenseman, who was playing 22+ min a game the first 4 games. Especially as our #3 RHD is also out of the lineup, and our #4 RHD was out of the lineup yesterday either because of injury or the coach thinking he was unplayably bad

But sure we don't need carlo
 

TheReal13Linseman

Now accepting BitCoin
Oct 26, 2005
12,228
5,043
Nation's Capital
Nah don't need one of our top 2 defensive defenseman, who was playing 22+ min a game the first 4 games. Especially as our #3 RHD is also out of the lineup, and our #4 RHD was out of the lineup yesterday either because of injury or the coach thinking he was unplayably bad

But sure we don't need carlo
Top two?

Yeah, ok.

I’d rather have Shattenkirk, actually.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4ORRBRUIN

Zillah

Bleed Black and Gold
Apr 4, 2011
5,242
8,200
West Kelowna B.C.
Nah don't need one of our top 2 defensive defenseman, who was playing 22+ min a game the first 4 games. Especially as our #3 RHD is also out of the lineup, and our #4 RHD was out of the lineup yesterday either because of injury or the coach thinking he was unplayably bad

But sure we don't need carlo
That’s the problem exactly. Brandon Carlo on most teams would be a fifth or sixth defenseman. The fact that he elevated to a top slot on our team says everything. Yes, the same Brandan Carlo, who keeps us hemmed in our end time after time inability to win board battles or just clear the zone. Always an adventure when he is on the ice. I miss Peek a hell of a lot more
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad