Huck Cheever
Registered User
- Sep 27, 2018
- 855
- 503
If we bring back this rule then we need a rule to be able to drill any goalie that touches the puck outside the crease
If players aren't allowing in the crease at all, then goalies shouldn't be allowed outside it
Part of the problem with it is that these guys are trained for years that they can go in the crease, and not obstruct. Telling them that suddenly can't, well, many didn't really adjust well. Plus, in the heat of a game, if you are jockeying for position, sometimes you get a little too close and edge in. Players know they can't mug a goalie. Interference has always been subjective.Good point. I'm too young to remember the rule being in place, but I would have thought that players would be able to avoid skating in the crease if they knew that it was illegal.
The NHL issued statements saying:Foot in crease would be fine if Brett Hull didn't troll the whole NHL by scoring the SCF winning goal with his foot in the crease. Brett Hull ended the foot in the crease goal and his SCF goal was illegal and Hasek and Sabres should have won cup
If a goalie is touched by anyone when the goalie is in the crease it’s a no goal. Just make it that simple.
NO.I know people hated it so much, especially because of the 99 cup finals, but given how Goalie Interference has become a hot topic in hockey, and the fact that we have coaches challenges now (and an actual replay center), I think a Foot in Crease rule would work well in todays NHL.
It'd stop guys from getting so close to goalies, and bumping into them so often (goalies are more at risk for concussions as well in these instances), so we wouldn't need Goalie Interference reviews as often.
I know in international hockey they have the foot in crease rule where if an opposing player does it, the faceoff ends up outside the zone.
Honestly... The less rules like this the better. In theory they sound great but once it's in the hands of the refs and coaches.. it becomes a CSI investigation.I can already see the 20 minute review on if a guy's pinkie toe entered the crease before the puck crossed the line. Oh boy!
But was the skate off the ice!?!I can already see the 20 minute review on if a guy's pinkie toe entered the crease before the puck crossed the line. Oh boy!
Well you're almost right. The game should not have ended there.Foot in crease would be fine if Brett Hull didn't troll the whole NHL by scoring the SCF winning goal with his foot in the crease. Brett Hull ended the foot in the crease goal and his SCF goal was illegal and Hasek and Sabres should have won cup
With the amount of effort Hasek put in with the best goalie season in modern history Sabres deserved cup. They had a bunch of scrubs and Mike Peca and Hasek.Well you're almost right. The game should not have ended there.
I wouldn't be opposed to it, but it needs to be the international rules version. Skater in the crease? Play blown dead.
Keeps it black and white so that players can adjust, so maybe initially for the first few weeks we have a few extra faceoffs per game but after that they settle into the new status quo.
Deserve's got nothing to do with it. If the goal doesn't count, it just means the game goes on. Dallas could have won it all anyway.With the amount of effort Hasek put in with the best goalie season in modern history Sabres deserved cup. They had a bunch of scrubs and Mike Peca and Hasek.
What does this even mean? Everyone everywhere is always trying to improve things because nothing in life is perfectWhat’s with this boards fascination with trying to change everything? Just stop
With the amount of effort Hasek put in with the best goalie season in modern history Sabres deserved cup. They had a bunch of scrubs and Mike Peca and Hasek.