flapanthersfan
Registered User
I think that's bad logic. But niskanen is only 27 so I don't think he's a bad option to overpay.
Campbell is miles better than Niskanen though.
Only guy who could capably replace Soupy is Markov.
I think that's bad logic. But niskanen is only 27 so I don't think he's a bad option to overpay.
just heard on sportsnet that he did not request a trade but has said if a trade possibility comes up he would consider waiving his no trade but only to a contender.... so this isnt as bad as its made out to be... anyone at this stage of his career would probably want to play for a contender but its not like hes forcing it... i doubt he gets moved
Orpik? Not for big money.I wouldn't mind trading an aging Campbell if we're serious about throwing big time bucks at guys like Orpik or Niskanen to shore up the D. You've got Louie in the pipes, now build out by having a solid top 4 D and use Campbell to bring in a top 6 forward? That would be worth exploring IMO and means you aren't depending on signing a Statsny for examply.
Campbell is probably as frustrated as the rest of us. He's approaching the last years of his career and wants to win - who wouldn't be frustrated with the perpetual rebuilding here?
Campbell is miles better than Niskanen though.
Only guy who could capably replace Soupy is Markov.
Oh I agree entirely.
If I were Tallon I would buy and trade for defense.
I don't have a problem with bringing in Niskanen, just not at 6/per.
So, could this be realistic? ( don't burn, just asking)
Make a trade surrounding Campbell for Tanev+6th overall
Make a trade around Kulikov for ROR
Draft Ekblad and Ehlers
Sign Markov and Niskanin ( probably spelled wrong)
We're bringing in four D to replace Kuli and Campbell
Markov-Niskani
Tanev-Guds
Olsen-Ekblad
Gilbert/Pertrovic/Robak
We're bringing ROR and Ehlers (future)
Sign Stasny and Vanek.
So, could this be realistic? ( don't burn, just asking)
Make a trade surrounding Campbell for Tanev+6th overall
Make a trade around Kulikov for ROR
Draft Ekblad and Ehlers
Sign Markov and Niskanin ( probably spelled wrong)
We're bringing in four D to replace Kuli and Campbell
Markov-Niskani
Tanev-Guds
Olsen-Ekblad
Gilbert/Pertrovic/Robak
We're bringing ROR and Ehlers (future)
Sign Stasny and Vanek.
So, could this be realistic? ( don't burn, just asking)
Make a trade surrounding Campbell for Tanev+6th overall
Make a trade around Kulikov for ROR
Draft Ekblad and Ehlers
Sign Markov and Niskanin ( probably spelled wrong)
We're bringing in four D to replace Kuli and Campbell
Markov-Niskani
Tanev-Guds
Olsen-Ekblad
Gilbert/Pertrovic/Robak
We're bringing ROR and Ehlers (future)
Sign Stasny and Vanek.
We have a fantasy offer thread for stuff like this..So, could this be realistic? ( don't burn, just asking)
Make a trade surrounding Campbell for Tanev+6th overall
Make a trade around Kulikov for ROR
Draft Ekblad and Ehlers
Sign Markov and Niskanin ( probably spelled wrong)
We're bringing in four D to replace Kuli and Campbell
Markov-Niskani
Tanev-Guds
Olsen-Ekblad
Gilbert/Pertrovic/Robak
We're bringing ROR and Ehlers (future)
Sign Stasny and Vanek.
We have a fantasy offer thread for stuff like this..
We have a fantasy offer thread for stuff like this..
The Canucks aren't trading two quality players for 2 years of Brian Campbell.
In a perfect world, yes.
In Panther reality, no.
I'm just spit-ballin here. I said it could be surrounding that, but players could be added to it. Or switch Campbell and Kulikov, If Van wants to go younger.
Van gets Kuli+ gives them a younger, top 4 Dman to help with the rebuild
Col gets Campbell that helps give them a top Dman,who is seasoned, but can help solidify their back end.
If Tallon got that deal done, he'd immediately be inducted into the HOF
No.
He's been good on a crap team.
When youplay half the game and have no one to make an outlet pass to and have to skate it out all the time it may make you look like crap.
To say he's been crap is truly unfair.