BruinsFanSince94
The Perfect Fan ™
one guy can’t do it all, expecting one to do it isn’t going to work
One guy is better than no guys. It doesn't stop with Frederic though. More needs to be addressed.
one guy can’t do it all, expecting one to do it isn’t going to work
I remember liking this kid and his brother when they were still just being drafted... they are my 'type' of players. I like size with a scoring touch.
hell... over the years I liked kids like kyle wanvig, landon Wilson, lee goren, sandy moger, brett Connolly, jimmy hayes...
if you give me a guy with size and hands... I will usually hope for the best.
when we finally got ritchie this year... i was pretty optimistic. I did forsee he would be getting time with krejci... at least a chance to show himself as a player. and being optimistic, I was imagining a 20 goal type season if he grabbed this opportunity and ran with it.
but... whatever...
today hes on waivers... and honestly he deserves it based on what he did for us
personally I am thinking... it means kuhlman will be called up and thats ok with me. kuhlman has a motor... he has heart. I like heart even more than I like size.
I dont regret giving Ritchie a chance. I wish it had worked since I overpaid to trade for him on my sim team. it can be interesting I guess to see if hes the next accari or Connolly and goes off to light it up on his next stop
Bad signing, sionara buddy.
So because he fought someone before and held his own, that makes him a fighter or enforcer? I couldn’t disagree with your logic or that of others who have this train of though, to be honest. Ritchie wasn’t brought in to be an enforcer or fighter here and never really has been. If his last resort is trying to literally fight and stay in the lineup, it’s just a waste. You can fault Ritchie for a lot, but blaming him for being something he never has been just doesn’t make sense to me.
I usually agree with you but how do you know for a fact what he was brought into the lineup to do?? These are pretty reasonable assumptions people are making and there comes a time where one disagrees just to be a contrarian and try to show ho smart they are
I mean, then why don’t they waive the other players aside from Carlo and Nordstrom who did nothing about it? Blaming and faulting Ritchie for lack of fighting or response last night is just lazy and unfair, IMO. He’s never been a fighter and he’s never really even been that physical of a player. The Bruins didn’t sign him to be that guy and they never said it either.
I really don’t see why Ritchie is getting the blame for this. Seems like it’s a fan-driven topic that Ritchie was supposed to be some enforcer or bruiser just because he’s 6’4” and over 200lbs. Shame on the writers like Joe Haggerty, because of course he tweeted something idiotic, that had a take today citing Ritchie is dumped because of a “lack of response” last night. Just my opinion, but this is a long time coming and even on Ritchie’s best nights, like the last three games, he still just isn’t good enough to contribute.
So do we know if anyone has been called up? Or do you guys think they'll roll with Backes?
Brett Ritchie has never been that guy. I don't think he's aggressive in nature. He doesn't engage. Avoids confrontation. That's been his MO. He had his opportunity on a silver platter. Either he didn't want to be that guy or was too dumb to understand what he was signed to provide. Took long enough to make this call.
I'd put Backes on the fourth line at least every other game. He can't be traded with that contract and he obviously is not going to retire until he decides he's going to retire. Better to make some use of him- nothing wrong with his toughness, hockey IQ or hands- than to have him in the press box. I'd waive Lindholm- he's a good PKer but that's about it.
He could have been a fan favorite even if he Greg Campbell'd his fights.
I imagine he told the Bruins he would be that player if they gave him this chance. Otherwise there was not much of a reason to sign him.