Confirmed with Link: Brett Connolly suspension 4 games

Illinihockey

Registered User
Jun 15, 2010
24,526
2,854
In this photo, the puck is just below the "t" in the board ad. Radulov's hands are turned over-not indicative of trying to chip it off the glass. Kero and Connolly are both seeing this at the same time and then WHAM. Unfortunate hockey play IMO.

Suspend him because of the result of the play which is fine by me but definitely not an intent to injure on 20's part.

Screen-Shot-2021-12-19-at-9.06.47-PM.png


How about this photo where the puck is on the glass. Ya Kero should have known a puck getting wrung around the boards made him fair game to get creamed. For the record this puck did go up off the glass and down the ice for icing with no one ever coming close to touching it.
 

Marotte Marauder

Registered User
Aug 10, 2008
8,587
2,442
Ya Kero should have known a puck getting wrung around the boards made him fair game to get creamed.

I have no idea why Kero kept looking backward while skating forward if, as you say it was clearly going to be high and hard off the glass for an icing.

Seems that 2 NHL players read the play differently than you have.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobbyJet

Illinihockey

Registered User
Jun 15, 2010
24,526
2,854
I have no idea why Kero kept looking backward while skating forward if, as you say it was clearly going to be high and hard off the glass for an icing.

Seems that 2 NHL players read the play differently than you have.

the puck was behind him, it got rung around, by the time he got his head around to track the puck some plug was taking his head off
 
  • Like
Reactions: Giovi

Marotte Marauder

Registered User
Aug 10, 2008
8,587
2,442
Screen-Shot-2021-12-19-at-9.06.47-PM.png


How about this photo where the puck is on the glass. Ya Kero should have known a puck getting wrung around the boards made him fair game to get creamed. For the record this puck did go up off the glass and down the ice for icing with no one ever coming close to touching it.

Assuming the puck was travelling at 60 MPH, it covers 88feet per second. The difference in puck location in the 2 photos is about 30 feet +/-.

So this took all of 1/3rd of a second.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pertti

hawksrule

Lot of brains but no polish
May 18, 2014
20,898
10,533
Assuming the puck was travelling at 60 MPH, it covers 88feet per second. The difference in puck location in the 2 photos is about 30 feet +/-.

So this took all of 1/3rd of a second.

It was a soft backhand clear off the boards. Wasn’t going anywhere close to 60 mph.
 

Marotte Marauder

Registered User
Aug 10, 2008
8,587
2,442
It was a soft backhand clear off the boards. Wasn’t going anywhere close to 60 mph.

WTH play are you watching? It was a forehand clear/pass whatever that went the length of the ice in 3 seconds. Roughly 180 feet.

So the frames shown took 1/2 second instead of 1/3 second. Significant difference? Meh.
 

hawksrule

Lot of brains but no polish
May 18, 2014
20,898
10,533
WTH play are you watching? It was a forehand clear/pass whatever that went the length of the ice in 3 seconds. Roughly 180 feet.

So the frames shown took 1/2 second instead of 1/3 second. Significant difference? Meh.

If it went 180 feet in 3 seconds, that would be 40 mph, not 60. If it took 4 seconds to go 180 feet (which I think is more likely), then it was 30 mph. Either way, far cry from 60.
 

BobbyJet

The accountability era?
Oct 27, 2010
29,950
9,944
Dundas, Ontario. Can
If it went 180 feet in 3 seconds, that would be 40 mph, not 60. If it took 4 seconds to go 180 feet (which I think is more likely), then it was 30 mph. Either way, far cry from 60.
LOL. The bottom line is, this is the NHL. Keep your head up with the puck or when receiving a possible pass. If you don't it is at your own peril and it might get ugly. It matters not if the hit is borderline or if it's illegal to the guy who ends up in a hospital bed.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Marotte Marauder

Marotte Marauder

Registered User
Aug 10, 2008
8,587
2,442
If it went 180 feet in 3 seconds, that would be 40 mph, not 60. If it took 4 seconds to go 180 feet (which I think is more likely), then it was 30 mph. Either way, far cry from 60.

At least you've come off the backhand sauce pass idea. Now watch the video and check the timer on it.
 

Illinihockey

Registered User
Jun 15, 2010
24,526
2,854
LOL. The bottom line is, this is the NHL. Keep your head up with the puck or when receiving a possible pass. If you don't it is at your own peril and it might get ugly. It matters not if the hit is borderline or if it's illegal to the guy who ends up in a hospital bed.

He never was close to receiving a pass, that’s the point. It was a hard clearance out of the zone and Kero got clobbered before he even looked up ice
 

Marotte Marauder

Registered User
Aug 10, 2008
8,587
2,442
He never was close to receiving a pass, that’s the point. It was a hard clearance out of the zone and Kero got clobbered before he even looked up ice

You need to huddle up with hawksrule and get one story line. You have it as a hard clear off the glass for icing, he has a soft backhander that took awhile to get to the other end.

The hit was a penalty because Kero never had the puck.

The hit was worse because Kero committed the cardinal sin of not understanding that he left himself very vulnerable.

Both can be true at the same time.
 

Illinihockey

Registered User
Jun 15, 2010
24,526
2,854
You need to huddle up with hawksrule and get one story line. You have it as a hard clear off the glass for icing, he has a soft backhander that took awhile to get to the other end.

The hit was a penalty because Kero never had the puck.

The hit was worse because Kero committed the cardinal sin of not understanding that he left himself very vulnerable.

Both can be true at the same time.

theres no rule you have to expect a hit when you don’t have the puck. He literally has no reason to expect to get hit there, no reason to protect himself
 

BobbyJet

The accountability era?
Oct 27, 2010
29,950
9,944
Dundas, Ontario. Can
theres no rule you have to expect a hit when you don’t have the puck. He literally has no reason to expect to get hit there, no reason to protect himself
If Kero never again plays an NHL game, I'm sure he'll feel better that he didn't break any rules. :sarcasm:

... he only broke THE unwritten "rule" that every player should abide by.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Marotte Marauder

Marotte Marauder

Registered User
Aug 10, 2008
8,587
2,442
theres no rule you have to expect a hit when you don’t have the puck. He literally has no reason to expect to get hit there, no reason to protect himself

OMG, from 10 year olds on up, hockey players are (should be) taught to protect yourself at all times and keep your head on a swivel. Example, a player loses an edge and does a major wipeout. He comes barreling down on you, takes your legs out and down you go, bouncing your melon off the ice. Might have been nice if you saw him coming but you were admiring your nice saucer pass.

It doesn't hurt less because neither player broke any rules.
 

Illinihockey

Registered User
Jun 15, 2010
24,526
2,854
OMG, from 10 year olds on up, hockey players are (should be) taught to protect yourself at all times and keep your head on a swivel. Example, a player loses an edge and does a major wipeout. He comes barreling down on you, takes your legs out and down you go, bouncing your melon off the ice. Might have been nice if you saw him coming but you were admiring your nice saucer pass.

It doesn't hurt less because neither player broke any rules.

literally no one is teaching that. You are taught to play with your head up but no one is taught hey you might get blindsided at any moment regardless of where the puck is. Kero wasn’t admiring anything, is it your hypothesis that no one ever tries to locate the puck with their eyes during a game? Hundreds of times every game someone could get their head taken off if someone wanted to blindside them away from the puck.

geez how could churla not see this coming, well his fault I guess

 

Giovi

Registered User
Sponsor
Feb 1, 2009
2,484
3,429
It doesn't matter how defensive a driver you are, there's always a chance a drunk driver going thirty over blows a red light and t bones you.
And I'm sure some here will find a way to blame you after you've been t-boned.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad