Great contract for guhle
Yes, depending on when it actually happens2-year deal makes him Seattle eligible if needed, no?
Either 40 games next season, or 70 combined between this season and next.Solid depth moves. How many NHL games does Guhle need to play now in order to be exposed in the expansion draft?
I would let Persson go. At $1 million per year, one way, he is too expensive.Still gotta sign Milano, Larsson, Terry, Sherwood, and Persson in terms of RFAs
Yeah, I think Hakanpaa has passed him on the depth chart, no need to keep another RH 8th d manI would let Persson go. At $1 million per year, one way, he is too expensive.
Either 40 games next season, or 70 combined between this season and next.
Well, he can be exposed no matter how many games he plays. But we have to expose one D who meets the 30/70 criteria. Maybe he’s it. Maybe it’s someone else like Larsson.
Yeah, there are all sorts of possibilities. Djoos is also a possibility if he's a regular next season. He's unsigned for 21-22 but we hold his RFA rights, so we could easily retain him. Even Gudbranson could fit, although it wouldn't make much sense to re-sign him only to expose him right away.Yeah I meant how many games did he need to be able to be counted for the exposure requirements.
So basically it’s 40 next season in either case as he played 30 this year. Looks like Larsson is the guy who is more likely to qualify, if we can sign him past next season he only needs 10 games. At least it looks likely we have at least one guy who counts.
I would try to keep him for depth but he might want to go back to Europe. Our RHD depth is very thin, just Manson, Gudbranson, Hakanpaa, and a bunch of players who have to shift to their off side. Having another natural RHD with NHL upside is a need. I’d much rather buy out Backes and play either Agozzino, Carrick, or Rowney at 4C and use part of the $1.5M we’d save on Persson.I would let Persson go. At $1 million per year, one way, he is too expensive.
Great deals for this organization. Guhle deal is on a very reasonable number, albeit that one-way worries me a bit, would be great if that first year would have been two-way. We are at 6 one way D contracts right now. 3d pair of Guhle-Hawk would be interesting to watch Jani keep improving defensively.
And Carrick I suspect will again play basically for SD, which is great for the org overall.
If we send him down, we can lose him. Or am I completely lost my hockey brain already?Why does the one way matter to you. Just means he's getting paid either way. I don't think we need to lose sleep over a 800k contract.
Waiver eligibility doesn't change
1 way/2 way has nothing to do with waivers (the NHL video games are the reason people think that). 2 way just means that he gets paid a different salary in the minors. 1 way deals mean that he gets that 800K salary whether he's in the NHL or AHL.If we send him down, we can lose him. Or am I completely lost my hockey brain already?