danielpalfredsson
youtube dot com /watch?v=CdqMZ_s7Y6k
- Aug 14, 2013
- 16,575
- 9,269
I’m pretty sure 90% of the other teams can’t afford these contracts, and most of the teams with money are at the cap already and have their own players to worry about, and why would other teams drive up the price of RFA players? They are already upset with what Toronto gave their own players, never mind doing it to each other.
8 million for Chabot is not driving up the RFA market anymore than Ryan O'Reilly signing for 5 million back in 2012 would drive up the RFA market. There's significant historical evidence to support that market value for Chabot should be in the 8.5-9.0 million range over 7 years when he becomes an RFA on July 1st 2020. This is based around elite young defenders historically getting over 10 percent of the cap, and the cap projected to be around 86.5 million.
The idea that he'd sign 8.XX x 5 years is not enough to drive up the market. It would also (similar to O'Reilly) be seen as an apple and oranges type situation since it would have been a contract signed under an offer sheet and not a typical RFA negotiation. You can listen to interviews with agents and execs who will explain that typically agents use comparable situations to dictate contracts (IE they won't go in with an RFA and say "this UFA got this"). Similar to how O'Reilly didn't lead to a bunch of 5M (which was a ton at the time) bridge deals, a Chabot offer sheet won't be likely to disrupt the RFA market.
4.XXM for White over 4-5 years is also not enough to drive up the market for the same reasons above.