Proposal: Bos-van
- Thread starter Siludin
- Start date
PG Canuck
Registered User
- Mar 29, 2010
- 63,020
- 24,259
PatriceBergeronFan
Registered User
We don't have Chiarelli either, thank goodness.
No to this trade. Pastrnak has to be untouchable unless we are getting an elite, impact, star player.
BruinLVGA
CZ Shadow 2 Compact coming my way!
I think Pastrnak would be exactly what we would want as a return on Tanev. Let's not keep using the Hall-Larsson trade as an example. And from Bostons side I don't know how much you need a defensive stud on the back so I can't judge. But I'm guessing from reactions Pastrnak is worth more to you than a defensive presence on the back.
Would we pay someone like Boeser for Zaitsev? I mean, come on. Us Canucks fans need to look at the trade from the other side. Even if it feels underwhelming.
Would we pay someone like Boeser for Zaitsev? I mean, come on. Us Canucks fans need to look at the trade from the other side. Even if it feels underwhelming.
Oates2Neely
Registered User
My only regret in making this thread is not noticing that the Bruins have a decent amount of right-handed defensemen already. I did use the Hall trade as a benchmark in my logic.
without getting into fair value, I think the Bruins are going to need Pastarnak a lot more than they are going to need Tanev going forward. Based on that I will have to say no thanks.
ChargersRookie
Registered User
- Jun 30, 2014
- 1,899
- 109
Thus one of the reason Canuck fans are dumped on.
No matter how much fantasy is on here try to show some seriousness.
Tanev is great for you but not so much else where.
Thus one of the reason Canuck fans are dumped on.
No matter how much fantasy is on here try to show some seriousness.
Tanev is great for you but not so much else where.
What phenomenon makes tanev only "great" on the Canucks?
what more do you want for tanev? this is exactly the kind of return we should be looking for.
Are we over-valuing Tanev just a might???? The Canucks were saying the same about Keith Ballard in 2010
Thus one of the reason Canuck fans are dumped on.
No matter how much fantasy is on here try to show some seriousness.
Tanev is great for you but not so much else where.
This makes no sense.
Blueangel1891
Registered User
Dr Danglefest
Lindros|Giroux|Krug
This season? The only one would be maybe Marchand. I also like the "just to name a few" comment as if there was anyone else on the Bruins even close this season
PG Canuck
Registered User
- Mar 29, 2010
- 63,020
- 24,259
Not a chance this trade happens, I would not trade Pastrnak for anyone on the Canucks right now. Tanev is pretty good, but overrated a bit on these boards, most I would offer is Spooner + B prospect.
northeastern
Registered User
I'd definitely be willing to go higher than that but I'm not willing to send pasta out of town for tanev. Spooner as a centerpiece would be optimal.
What do Van fans want for tanev if they think pasta isn't enough?
I think the majority of Vancouver fans would be thrilled if they pulled off tanev for pasta.
Addison Rae
Registered User
chris tanev is so grossly underrated by people who don't know how to accurately evaluate non scorers. we're looking at objectively the best defensive player in the entire NHL over the past 2 seasons, and people are offering spooner and a ****ing 3rd.
tanev is really good at hockey and would be far and away the best dman on the bruins.
tanev is really good at hockey and would be far and away the best dman on the bruins.
BostonBob
4 Ever The Greatest
chris tanev is so grossly overrated by people who don't know how to accurately evaluate non scorers.
pastrnak is really good at hockey and would be far and away the best forward on the canucks.
