Of course its not me, in a perfect world I'd give Ryan 6M tops, Spezza 6.5M. Ryan doesn't do enough in other areas to demand 7M+ in my opinion and Spezza has regressed. They could get more on the open market, but they don't deserve it.
Appreciate you answering the question, since all I have seen is people suggesting Spezza is better.
I believe $6 - $6.5M is fair for Ryan, probably because I think he does play a 200' game and competes at both ends of the ice. I also believe his presence has had a been a big factor in Turris and MacArthur's production.
Ideally he would be a little faster but he definitely skates well enough.
Production isn't a one player stat and there are other factors that players can't control.
First, Turris went through a spell where he wasn't playing his best hockey and MacArthur also had a 10 game scoring drought. Both of these things occurred over the period where Ryan's production slowed.
Secondly, this team takes too many penalties, this has a tremendous impact on the TOI of a player like Ryan, subsequently his production falls.
The line's struggles were probably the reason Ryan was moved to play with Zibanejad, where Ryan looked just fine.
Spezza is probably worth similar money IMO, he has undeniable offensive talent but when the Senators don't have the puck he is not very good at all.
If the Senators are going to add more veteran players to the top six, players that are responsible and have offensive skill, then I believe BM should offer him a deal in the $6M range.
However if the organization is committed to going with youth, then BM should trade Spezza for a young center that has a more complete game, knowingly sacrificing some offensive talent.
Spezza and whatever wingers assigned to play with him will have difficulty being plus players unless Spezza is in the 70 - 80 point range. I just don't believe he will attain those number playing with inexperienced players, he never has so why should BM expect it now.