Mrb1p
PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
The Habs give up the best players with bad contracts for one good and two baf players with bad contracts? Shafted.
I just think that there has been no other player on this team right now that bleeds kings colors more then Brown He has seen the really bad king teams in the beginning and Captained our 2 cup winning teams. He is known to be a leader in off season as well As any new player the kings are courting as ufa or trade for meet Brown first to get the players side of living in la . He represents the Kings in so many off ice things. There is more to his game then points to me. I like his physical side and ability to draw penalties If any King player deserves some loyalty its Brown. He also was /is huge part of our pk and has been for years. I would rather see him retire as a king or at the very worse traded and get back someone worth while ( picks prospects ) not a cap dump like shaw.
they don'tWhy do the Kings/Brown/Quick need a shakeup?
He has a high cap hit.
He isn't as good as he once was.
He has recent injuries.
There is a good chance he comes back and is still a good 1st line option.
If he retires early (which he more than likely will) the recapture penalties are not on Montreal, they are on Nashville.
Is this enlightened enough for you? Or can you enlighten me further?
Hopefully Weber can comeback close to what he was. One of my favorite players to watch as long as he is not on the ice against LA. He is one of those players that scares the **** out of me.
Didn’t brown get around 60 pts this year? I don’t think Kings do this. Rather have quick than price too.To MTL:
Brown
Phaneuf
Quick
4th round pick in 2020
To LAK:
Price (MTL retains 25%)
Weber
Shaw
6th round pick in 2020
Welcome to the Boat Anchor Ball!
This is a change of scenery / shake it up trade. I think both teams do benefit in many ways.
Why do the Kings/Brown/Quick need a shakeup?
There is no reason Habs fans can't like Weber, while also disliking the trade.I think that I enlightened you based on your reaction. If you were enlightened back when the Subban trade occured, then you wouldn't have such an emotional response today (the day of your enlightenment).
If you think your opinion is shared by most Habs fans then let me enlighten you again:
^This!
Half of the fans liked the trade and like Weber!
I love it.To MTL:
Brown
Phaneuf
Quick
4th round pick in 2020
To LAK:
Price (MTL retains 25%)
Weber
Shaw
6th round pick in 2020
Welcome to the Boat Anchor Ball!
This is a change of scenery / shake it up trade. I think both teams do benefit in many ways.
The West in general needs a shake up. VGK went through every team like balsa wood. Then they faced the East and it wasn't even a competition for WSH.
There is no reason Habs fans can't like Weber, while also disliking the trade.
I have never liked the trade, but that doesn't mean Weber isn't a good player, I would have rather kept Subban as he was younger and better. Which is not an uncommon opinion.
And a LA fan saying Weber scared the **** out of him on Nashville is proof of what?
Really? You would rather have that price and Weber contract hanging over you? I think mtrl does this easilyAbsolutely brutal for MTL. No chance.
Really? You would rather have that price and Weber contract hanging over you? I think mtrl does this easily
Price is made of glass with a terrible term. Quick is much more valuable right now. Weber has 7 yrs doesn’t he? He’s already declining plus injured. These two will weigh down mtrl for yrs so why would kings take them for a 60pt scorer and a good goalie?Price is a 31 year old recent Hart winner playing a position and style that traditionally ages well.
Weber was injured last season but was 6th in Norris voting the year before. If you're concerned about the term on his deal maybe you should google "Marion Hossa".
That doesn't even take into account the proposed retention in the deal that means MTL would actually be ADDING cap to downgrade from their best players.
Helll no.
All things considered:
Quick>Price (5.8M VS 10.5M a year.)
Brown>>>>>Shaw (5.8M vs 3.9M for the next 4 years for a much lesser player.)
Phaneuf>>Weber (3 years of 5.2M of Phaneuf VS 7 years of 7.8M of a injury prone Weber.)
To be fair I think alot of people were saying how Quick was made of glass and how bad his contract was after his groin injury. Injuries happen and players can bounce back. For me when both are 100% healthy I would rather have Quick at $4m less a year, plus less term means less risk.Price is made of glass with a terrible term. Quick is much more valuable right now. Weber has 7 yrs doesn’t he? He’s already declining plus injured. These two will weigh down mtrl for yrs so why would kings take them for a 60pt scorer and a good goalie?
It does beg the question (this is why I made this powerful thread):
Will Quick's style run its' course in due time?
Will Price's style be better suited for the long-term in Los Angeles?