TarasenkosForearm
Registered User
- Oct 21, 2017
- 3,119
- 3,195
I dont have a clue who is projected 1st the year following this one. Not sure though, sorry.Top ten this year, then doesn't it go unprotected next year?
I dont have a clue who is projected 1st the year following this one. Not sure though, sorry.Top ten this year, then doesn't it go unprotected next year?
He had his kids and got fixed. Now he is just shootin blanks.Just finished the game.
The decision to pull Allen with 5 minutes left and you're gifted a 4v3 PP was just a head scratcher. It was the wrong decision no matter what the outcome was.
Panger was calling out Tarasenko, and he definitely didn't have his best game. He had way too many turnovers. Edmundson had some wtf moments that could have easily been 2 goals. Does anyone ever call out Pietrangelo? Besides almost countless gaffes this year what is he providing that makes a positive difference in games? He can stick check? No way he's a top 10 D in this league. If the Blues were smart they would trade him for the biggest haul available, and give the C to O'Reilly.
Fabbri's pass to spring the short handed goal can't happen. It's such an easy play to anticipate there's no way you can make that pass.
Why in the **** is Tarasenko playing the point on the PP? What in the wide wide world of ****ty ass sports is going on here? I'll give Berube one plus because the team actually showed some heart but at least two minuses for pulling the goalie and playing 91 on the point.
Trade Pietrangelo now before the league catches on how far he's slipped. **** he can't hit the net for **** sake
I just want to add that Petro has looked like ****ing **** ever since his wife had triplets. I know it's stupid for me to say this but **** I admire Jagr so much. He had only one love in his life and it was hockey. Players today just don't have the dedication of the greats.
I'm not talking about tanking in the sense that we have a sell off, but go look at the current projections for our ending season record. We are not making the playoffs this year. We would have to win more than 2 out of every 3 games left this season to get in. I'm talking about letting them flounder, selling off some underperforming "stars" at the deadline, and then coming back with a top 3 pick; and several other picks and A prospects. Look at this realistically. If we are in limbo all year as to who our coach is, and they aren't performing any better than this, our core is now in their late 20's. We also have a couple of guys who might leave because of our lack of success. Will Petro stay here anyway if handed more money? Honestly, watching Parayko skate into the oppositions zone is happening more and more often. He's acting like the top line d man right now, not just tonight, but pretty much this whole season.Idk guys.. if I’m being real I’m still not ready to be trying to tank already. Went through that s*** for a bit too long there before we started consistently making the playoffs. This is actually beyond frustrating and I didn’t think it would get to this point but then I remember what team we are and it doesn’t surprise me, but this is a whole new level. Insanely disappointed. Ty alcohol.
That's not true...not yet, at least.I'm not talking about tanking in the sense that we have a sell off, but go look at the current projections for our ending season record. We are not making the playoffs this year. We would have to win more than 2 out of every 3 games left this season to get in. I'm talking about letting them flounder, selling off some underperforming "stars" at the deadline, and then coming back with a top 3 pick; and several other picks and A prospects. Look at this realistically. If we are in limbo all year as to who our coach is, and they aren't performing any better than this, our core is now in their late 20's. We also have a couple of guys who might leave because of our lack of success. Will Petro stay here anyway if handed more money? Honestly, watching Parayko skate into the oppositions zone is happening more and more often. He's acting like the top line d man right now, not just tonight, but pretty much this whole season.
Sorry. Pulled a Robb.Maybe we should keep to discussing hockey and not each other. I am not liking the tone of this board in general lately, and this thread is awful. I think I might lurk for a while.
I'm a numbers guy. I know we aren't technically put out yet. I know we don't technically have to win 2 out of every 3 yet, but we are right on the cusp. When I make comments like that, I'm going on what I've seen out of them this year. Easton, do you believe that the team will make the playoffs based on their past, present, and, so far, unknown future play?That's not true...not yet, at least.
Blues currently have 17 points after 20 games.
Even if it takes 97 points to get in, the Blues can get the 80 points they need over their last 62 games without winning two out of every three. Something like a 37-19-6 record works just fine.
On paper, yes. With the remaining schedule, the task is getting tougher to pull off. And for perspective, 37-19-6 is "only" 105.8 point pace; this team hasn't cracked that mark since 2016 and last year's 21-8-2 start (120.3 point pace) was because Schenn and Schwartz were off to career years and the defense and goaltending were fantastic.That's not true...not yet, at least.
Blues currently have 17 points after 20 games.
Even if it takes 97 points to get in, the Blues can get the 80 points they need over their last 62 games without winning two out of every three. Something like a 37-19-6 record works just fine.
our core = no shows and babies. you will never win with these babies in leadership roles
I don't think it's impossible, but I do think it's unlikely.I'm a numbers guy. I know we aren't technically put out yet. I know we don't technically have to win 2 out of every 3 yet, but we are right on the cusp. When I make comments like that, I'm going on what I've seen out of them this year. Easton, do you believe that the team will make the playoffs based on their past, present, and, so far, unknown future play?
That's not true...not yet, at least.
Blues currently have 17 points after 20 games.
Even if it takes 97 points to get in, the Blues can get the 80 points they need over their last 62 games without winning two out of every three. Something like a 37-19-6 record works just fine.
Really? Playing with intensity is a positive?Tons of positives from this game. No, the blues aren't as structured or talented as the home team But played w intensity.
Blues need to step up their game at home and get in synch when to press and how to save energy defending, they work way too hard chasing in the d zone. Leads to fatigue and comes back to bite giving up in the transition, odd man breaks, turnovers...
For all the talk of playing a north/south, there's no such thing if you're effectively playing like you are killing penalties 5 vs 5
Really? Playing with intensity is a positive?
This isn’t directed toward you in particular but it’s a theme I’ve seen mentioned many times so I have to rant.
How low is the bar for this team? Like, there’s “lots of positives” when the team looks like they actually give a flying **** and don’t look like a complete sloppy pile of ****. That’s what we give them props for.
It’s so aggravating that we entered this season expecting to contend for the division and now we have to give them brownie points for showing emotion for once.
I agree that it was nice to see some fire out of some guys but that should always be expected out of grown ass professionals. This team should be WAY better. I didn’t catch every minute of the game but there’s no real positives for me. The team is just flat out not even close to the level of the really good teams in the league. And we shouldn’t be satisfied for this “well they showed effort” BS. We have a LONGGG way to go. I do not see this ship turning around soon.
I don't think it's impossible, but I do think it's unlikely.
If the Blues can put together a 10 game run of strong play at any point in the last 62 games, say winning 9 out of 10, they can be approximately league average in the other 52 games and get to 95 points.