Proposal: Blues - Leafs

[Gavy]

Lol! That's the pot calling the kettle black.

Are all of you going to reply with the same thing?

 

[WetcoastOrca]

Are all of you going to reply with the same thing?

I'm not sure. But if you support a one sided trade in your team's favour and then criticize others for calling you on it, then it's possible you'll get more responses.

 

[Gavy]

I'm not sure. But if you support a one sided trade in your team's favour and then criticize others for calling you on it, then it's possible you'll get more responses.

I mean, I didnt support anything but ok. Funny that you said "pot calling the kettle black" then accuse me of supporting a one sided trade (which I didnt do) after you just supported a one sided trade..

 

[TOGuy14]

No way the Leafs trade Matthews and effectively two 1st round picks for that package.

ROR is 30, and Parayko only has 1.5 years left on his deal

 

[WetcoastOrca]

I mean, I didnt support anything but ok. Funny that you said "pot calling the kettle black" then accuse me of supporting a one sided trade (which I didnt do) after you just supported a one sided trade..

Incorrect. You went through the trouble of copying multiple posts to try to support a one sided trade in your home team's favour.
But nice try at deflecting.

 

[Gavy]

Incorrect. You went through the trouble of copying multiple posts to try to support a one sided trade in your home team's favour.
But nice try at deflecting.

Incorrect and thats some weird logic.

You support a one sided trade in favour of the blues because you dont like the leafs. Pathetic.

I'll make this clear to you since you seem to have trouble understanding. I dont support this trade. I dont want this trade to happen. I dont like this trade. It is not a good trade for the leafs. You can try and find some hidden meaning behind me quoting multiple posts are you can literally take my word for it when I say I dont supoort this trade. The blues dont have a single player that could entice the leafs to trade Matthews

 

[WetcoastOrca]

Incorrect and thats some weird logic.

You support a one sided trade in favour of the blues because you dont like the leafs. Pathetic.

I'll make this clear to you since you seem to have trouble understanding. I dont support this trade. I dont want this trade to happen. I dont like this trade. It is not a good trade for the leafs. You can try and find some hidden meaning behind me quoting multiple posts are you can literally take my word for it when I say I dont supoort this trade. The blues dont have a single player that could entice the leafs to trade Matthews

A one sided trade in favour of the Leafs?
You’ve lost all perspective. If you want to go full homer then stick to the Leafs board instead of calling out others on the main board.

To be clear, I have absolutely no problem with you not wanting to trade Matthews. Just don’t act like those pointing out that the trade favours the Leafs are somehow being partisan. Pathetic.

 

[Hockeyholic]

Leafs laugh, hang up the phone and block St. Louis' number.

Um...how is Toronto worse off from this deal?

In a vacuum, Matthews might be better than ROR. But not enough to refuse a deal that includes a Conn Smythe Selke caliber centre, an arguable top 10 D in the league, and a projected top line player in Thomas.

Toronto definitely does this trade. St. Louis does not.

 

[Gavy]

A one sided trade in favour of the Leafs?
You’ve lost all perspective. If you want to go full homer then stick to the Leafs board instead of calling out others on the main board.

To be clear, I have absolutely no problem with you not wanting to trade Matthews. Just don’t act like those pointing out that the trade favours the Kesf are somehow being partisan.

So you think a trade is so one sided for the leafs yet a leaf fan doesn't want to do that. Try and hide your bias a bit.
Its a bad trade for the leafs, st Louis doesn't have anything to get Matthrws. Sorry that that upsets you.

I dont agree that it fsvours the leafs so we will have to agree to disagree since you've already resorted to insults.

P.s. I'll post where I want, hfboards doesnt need you policing peoples posting habits, they have mods for that

 

[The Moose is Loose]

Leafs laugh, hang up the phone and block St. Louis' number.

Not a chance in hell.

Yeah you guys keep telling yourself that

 

[Gavy]

Yeah you guys keep telling yourself that

I love when I see a username and I already know what their response will be before I read it. Never change lol

 

[The Moose is Loose]

So you think a trade is so one sided for the leafs yet a leaf fan doesn't want to do that. Try and hide your bias a bit.
Its a bad trade for the leafs, st Louis doesn't have anything to get Matthrws. Sorry that that upsets you.

I dont agree that it fsvours the leafs so we will have to agree to disagree since you've already resorted to insults.

P.s. I'll post where I want, hfboards doesnt need you policing peoples posting habits, they have mods for that

It’s pretty ironic when one of the most biased posters on this site tells others to check their bias.

and then you proceed on about how the Blues don’t have the pieces to get Matthews. Yeah sure buddy.

 

[WetcoastOrca]

So you think a trade is so one sided for the leafs yet a leaf fan doesn't want to do that. Try and hide your bias a bit.
Its a bad trade for the leafs, st Louis doesn't have anything to get Matthrws. Sorry that that upsets you.

I dont agree that it fsvours the leafs so we will have to agree to disagree since you've already resorted to insults.

P.s. I'll post where I want, hfboards doesnt need you policing peoples posting habits, they have mods for that

I agree that you can post where you want.
But if you’re going to go full homer on this Board and call out others in the process then expect some push back.

 

[Gavy]

It’s pretty ironic when one of the most biased posters on this site tells others to check their bias.

and then you proceed on about how the Blues don’t have the pieces to get Matthews. Yeah sure buddy.

Solid response " no u".

Yall keep responding with the same thing.

You dont trade a player like matthews without a player coming back that doesn't have close to the vslue he does.

 

[Gavy]

But if you’re going to go full homer on this Board and call out others in the process then expect some push back.

"Pot calling the kettle black"

 

[The Moose is Loose]

I agree that you can post where you want.
But if you’re going to go full homer on this Board and call out others in the process then expect some push back.

He’s always full homer, there’s no off switch. But any slight against the mighty leafs he’ll take it personally and then get aggressive at people on an online hockey forum over a hypothetical trade lmao. I assume he’s an adult (maybe I shouldn’t) but regardless it’s really immature and he does it like clockwork.

it’s really not worth fooling with

 

[glenbuis]

Neutral fan says this slanted in Toronto’s favor

 

[The Note]

The Blues simply cannot trade their current #1 C, their (possibly) soon to be #1 defenseman, and a good, young cost controlled player -- even for someone like Matthews.

 

[ElPrimeTime]

Neutral fan here. While I can totally understand not wanting to trade Matthews as he is the best player in this deal, the Leafs do improve if they make this trade. The drop off in offensive production is massively offset by the increase in defensive abilities both with ROR and Parayko.

Blues don't do this at all, especially with the chance of them losing Pietro.

 

[Morbo]

Auston Matthews is not available.

 

[WetcoastOrca]

Auston Matthews is not available.

Agreed. He’s the face of the franchise.

 

[Davimir Tarablad]

Parayko only has 1.5 years left on his deal

Apparently I've missed the first half of the 20-21 season watching the Cup finals

 

[Ranksu]

 

[thefutures]

St Louis would miss the playoffs for the next 4 years and eventually lose Matthews to FA. Don't see them doing this deal.

 

[LeafGrief]

Yeah you guys keep telling yourself that

Good idea.

Not a chance in hell.