OT: Blues Forum Lounge (Home of All Things OT) - Part IV

[Vladys Gumption]

Austin. I was confused at first, haha.

Crap. Yeah don't mind this idiot lol.

 

[Colt 55]

Rams have been terrible at identifying and developing WR talent in recent years, why would we take another?

 

[Daley Tarasenkshow]

Rams have been terrible at identifying and developing WR talent in recent years, why would we take another?

Bailey and Austin should turn out to be very solid players. Granted we haven't seen much of Quick yet. Pettis was good value for the mid-late rounds. I wouldn't discount them just yet.

 

[David Dennison]

Bailey and Austin should turn out to be very solid players. Granted we haven't seen much of Quick yet. Pettis was good value for the mid-late rounds. I wouldn't discount them just yet.

Givens is the one we are relying on most to develop.

Bradford and Austin looked really good together, but Austin is more Danny Amendola than true #1 receiver.

The passing game just took a back seat once Clemens came in. I think this offense could surprise if we can keep Bradford upright. Even if Long isnt ready, a Saffold-Robinson left side is more than adequate. Its going to be fun watching our pint sized running backs behind our big offensive line.

 

[Daley Tarasenkshow]

Givens is the one we are relying on most to develop.

Bradford and Austin looked really good together, but Austin is more Danny Amendola than true #1 receiver.

The passing game just took a back seat once Clemens came in. I think this offense could surprise if we can keep Bradford upright. Even if Long isnt ready, a Saffold-Robinson left side is more than adequate. Its going to be fun watching our pint sized running backs behind our big offensive line.

I still think Bailey can develop into a Miles Austin type (when he was good) as our #1 guy. That, with Austin in the slot, and hopefully Quick as the tall wideout can provide a very good setup for Bradford. I hope Givens can rebound and be a solid #3 guy.

 

[David Dennison]

I still think Bailey can develop into a Miles Austin type (when he was good) as our #1 guy. That, with Austin in the slot, and hopefully Quick as the tall wideout can provide a very good setup for Bradford. I hope Givens can rebound and be a solid #3 guy.

I am far less sold on Bailey as a receiver. His best plays last season came on special teams and on gadget plays. He has really good hands and is a smart player, but Im not sure there are any other outstanding qualities with him. He certainly has a place on my team though, I just dont see him being that 1-2 guy.

 

[Note Worthy]

I'm picturing Jon Hamm reading the article about himself and freaking out that EW (Entertainment Weekly, I assume) dare put he's not only a hockey fan but a Blues fan. How awesome.

 

[Daley Tarasenkshow]

I am far less sold on Bailey as a receiver. His best plays last season came on special teams and on gadget plays. He has really good hands and is a smart player, but Im not sure there are any other outstanding qualities with him. He certainly has a place on my team though, I just dont see him being that 1-2 guy.

Theres a reason why he out-produced Tavon at WVU. He showed tremendous flashes, and I don't think he ever dropped a single pass.