GDT: Blue Jackets vs. Red Wings, 11/11/23 @1:00

VT

Registered User
Jan 24, 2021
6,874
3,528
Slovakia
Bol ten správny čas začať s Elvisom, netuším, prečo je Martin v bránke.

A benching Chinakhov bol podľa mňa príliš skoro
Pretože zajtra hráme s Rangers.
Chinny must get shape back. I think it is right decision.
 

ViD

#CBJNeedHugs
Sponsor
Apr 21, 2007
29,819
19,374
Blue Jackets Area
Marchenko with a 5 game point streak despite 12 min TOI

Johnny Hockey on pace for 35 points. We can bench him but we need him to get going, so we have to keep playing him so he starts clicking, scoring and getting confidence
 
  • Like
Reactions: Farmboy Patty

Another Empty Netter

Registered User
Jan 14, 2011
316
221
Ok - maybe I agree but is your coach not mixing up the lines ? Is that what I’m reading? Some of this has to be on him if that’s the case
 

ViD

#CBJNeedHugs
Sponsor
Apr 21, 2007
29,819
19,374
Blue Jackets Area
Ok - maybe I agree but is your coach not mixing up the lines ? Is that what I’m reading? Some of this has to be on him if that’s the case
I think he’s trying to play more experienced guys even if they don’t produce as much

I've never seen him play this poorly - here or in Calgary.

And I certainly wouldn't have guessed he'd be the new whipping boy on these boards. But he deserves to be right now.
Not just him. Shockingly, after 14 games we still don’t have a player with 10 points this season
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Napoli

Youngguns80

A worthy goal is easy to defend
Sponsor
Jan 24, 2021
1,827
1,903
Ohio
I've never seen him play this poorly - here or in Calgary.

And I certainly wouldn't have guessed he'd be the new whipping boy on these boards. But he deserves to be right now.
You are right I am amazed how people have turned on him so quick.
 

majormajor

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
24,711
29,409
Coach earned my respect by benching Gaudreau but is losing it by not doing it again.

I don't think there's a disciplinary type solution for Gaudreau. Nor would I try and play him 20 a night to get him out of it. For whatever reason he's gotten steadily worse in the last 5 or so games.

I'd just play him 3rd line minutes and 2nd PP minutes until he shows that he's back. We don't benefit from changing things drastically all the time and it's distracting for the team to put much focus on Gaudreau right now. Just dial back his role and leave him be until he's back.

Edit: @cbjthrowaway should finally see their dream of Gaudreau and Sillinger together. Though that would be a weak line the way they're playing right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Michigan Magic

BB88

Registered User
Jan 19, 2015
40,880
20,497
I still don’t understand why they desperately want to take Laines one time option away


Fantilli should have been on the ice when they needed a goal

Gaudreau is sending a wrong message with his play right now. Soft, lazy, turnovers, no creativity.

Right now they are playing like a frustrating young team, lot of bad followed by lot of good. End up losing the games they should win
 

stevo61

Registered User
Jul 5, 2011
11,138
12,238
Canada
Looking at this team's 3rd pair options, it's pretty wild to keep Blankenburg in the AHL. Especially if Jiricek isn't going to play.
I wonder if they had Peeke offers they turned down and now regret so holding out hope they get something. He wouldnt be claimed if sent down though. Boqvist however cannot be lost for nothing. I know people complain hes a PP specialist but thats not exactly a terrible thing. Thats more on the coaching staff being too stupid to play players to their strengths
 
Last edited:

Napoli

Registered User
Oct 4, 2023
966
1,040
I wonder if they had Peeke offers they turned down and now regret so holding out hope they get something. He wouldnt be claimed if sent down though. Boqvist however cannot be lost for nothing. I know people complain hes a PP specialist but thats not exactly a terrible thing. Thats more on the coaching staff being too stupid to play to players strengths
Yep it's concerning how players aren't put in positions to succeed.
 

majormajor

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
24,711
29,409
I wonder if they had Peeke offers they turned down and now regret so holding out hope they get something. He wouldnt be claimed if sent down though. Boqvist however cannot be lost for nothing. I know people complain hes a PP specialist but thats not exactly a terrible thing. Thats more on the coaching staff being too stupid to play to players strengths

I'm honestly not sure if there's much trade value left for Boqvist either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thebus88

stevo61

Registered User
Jul 5, 2011
11,138
12,238
Canada
I'm honestly not sure if there's much trade value left for Boqvist either.
I know but they cant risk sending him down for nothing. He'd be claimed and I think can provide value in a proper role. A 3rd pair PP specialist isnt what Chicago or Columbus envisioned but it might just be what he is. Playing him with Peeke on his off side with no PP time is just setting a player up to fail. They could atleast play him in a proper role to show some value to the league and keep Jiricek down. Should have been that way from the start
 

majormajor

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
24,711
29,409
I know but they cant risk sending him down for nothing. He'd be claimed and I think can provide value in a proper role. A 3rd pair PP specialist isnt what Chicago or Columbus envisioned but it might just be what he is. Playing him with Peeke on his off side with no PP time is just setting a player up to fail. They could atleast play him in a proper role to show some value to the league and keep Jiricek down. Should have been that way from the start

I'd be fine with trying Boqvist on the right side, perhaps next to Provorov. But he might only be worth like a 2nd or 3rd so I don't care about it much as far as asset value goes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thebus88

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad