Not sure what this means, maybe some translation issues. Sillingers line was out there protecting a lead late in the game, Fantilli's line was stapled to the bench. The Fantilli line has gotten the team back into game for what? Atleast 3 games in a row but thats not enough to have them on the ice to defend the lead they usually create? Nah thats just bad coaching. Reward the players that put you in a position to winSillinger's line played often against bottom 6. Our 1st gets played with two injured players. Fantilli's line must learn.
You could tell Gudbranson wanted to say something completely different there.Can’t believe Metz asked if he was a moral victory because of how well they played in the third - the period where they were outshot by a gazillion
So we could bench Boqvist most of the game instead of him.Why did we send down Jiricek again ?
But if true it line, similar like kindergarden line, wouldn't play in the; portant moments when our opponents need score, on ice.Not sure what this means, maybe some translation issues. Sillingers line was out there protecting a lead late in the game, Fantilli's line was stapled to the bench. The Fantilli line has gotten the team back into game for what? Atleast 3 games in a row but thats not enough to have them on the ice to defend the lead they usually create? Nah thats just bad coaching. Reward the players that put you in a position to win
Ok call me crazy but after rewatching the GWG it never went in. It hit off the crossbar and came out.
A top notch production would have shown the alternate angle. Thanks for the update.View attachment 767535
the pick did, infact go in. you can barely see it in the betting behind the crossbar. blurry image, my b. the rangers’ feed also showed an alternate angle that showed it perfectly going in. it was a beauty of a goal honestly.
A top notch production would have shown the alternate angle. Thanks for the update.
It at first felt like a paper transaction as it was feeling like someone was finally going to get traded. Maybe fell through? Anyways if he's not getting the minutes here then its better at this point to get him 20+ minutes a night up in Cleveland. This team is going through its growing pains stage but we really need to get the 3 logjam D moved at some point. It takes two to tango with trades but I am just curious if Jarmo is just simply asking too much for them or if there are legit no takers for them as to me it seems Bean/Peeke/Boqvist still have value and you don't wanna just give them away.Why did we send down Jiricek again ?
It at first felt like a paper transaction as it was feeling like someone was finally going to get traded. Maybe fell through? Anyways if he's not getting the minutes here then its better at this point to get him 20+ minutes a night up in Cleveland. This team is going through its growing pains stage but we really need to get the 3 logjam D moved at some point. It takes two to tango with trades but I am just curious if Jarmo is just simply asking too much for them or if there are legit no takers for them as to me it seems Bean/Peeke/Boqvist still have value and you don't wanna just give them away.
At this point I'm convinced Pascal has no idea wat he's doing. Refusing to play the young gun line in key moments when the game is on the line. Sending his pets out for penalty shots undeservedly while others are scoring.
We may not be secretly in tank mode but it sure looks like it to me. Pascal had my respect but has now lost it just as quick as he earned it.
1 win in the last 10 games ftr
He has to open it up and reward the young guns for outworking the veterans.I'd love to see more shifts for Fantilli's line (in all parts of the game). I'm not happy with Pazzy's decision on that. But what you're talking about is what 90% of coaches would do in this situation. They limit rookie minutes, they put out their top veterans in the shootout, etc...
I hope someone is asking hard questions from Pascal and why the garbage decisions we keep seeing.
At any point did you feel comfortable them being able to protect the lead
Hence why we see coaches retread from organization to organization .. looking at Bedards minutes , they certainly aren’t doing this .. and Carlsson was initially said to have a schedule , but he’s been playing every night as well , and 18-20 minutes per night . Fantilli is getting 11-15 minutes regularly.. In overtime , Boone shouldn’t be out there , no should Kuraly or Danforth … should be Fantilli , Gaudreau , Chinakov , Marchenko , Texier , Laine ..: guys that are dynamic and can skateI'd love to see more shifts for Fantilli's line (in all parts of the game). I'm not happy with Pazzy's decision on that. But what you're talking about is what 90% of coaches would do in this situation. They limit rookie minutes, they put out their top veterans in the shootout, etc...
Yup.. it’s why I was so critical in a post game , of the broadcast .. Org surrounds themselves with yes men that parrot propaganda .. Tough Questions need to be asked .. Fans have been more than patient . It’s beyond ridiculous they hired Babcock and folded at the first chance they could .. you hire him knowing what comes with the coach. Jarmo is a good scout , and a poor architect. Always way slow to make the necessary moves needed …Nobody associated with this franchise asks any hard questions about anything. The whole Babcock mess is proof of that.
If they had asked hard questions, they never would have had hired him in the first place.
If they had asked hard questions, they never would have had Boone defend him when the story broke.
I have plenty of hard questions I’d like to ask.