Gabe Kupari
Registered User
3 team proposal
To Chicago Kuzmenko. Nate Schmidt
To Wpg and Vancouver : 2 signed Connor bedard rookie cards.
To Chicago Kuzmenko. Nate Schmidt
To Wpg and Vancouver : 2 signed Connor bedard rookie cards.
Wrong. He doesn’t fit Tocchett’s system. He’s still a 30+ goal scorer.He was a 30-40 goal scorer last season shooting at 27%. That has nothing to do with this season or the next. The reality is Kuzmenko is a healthy scratch player with a big caphit, who the Canucks are looking to move. If JR doesn't like a player, that player is done with the franchise.
Throw in a slightly used Kyle Conner card and you have yourself a deal3 team proposal
To Chicago Kuzmenko. Nate Schmidt
To Wpg and Vancouver : 2 signed Connor bedard rookie cards.
Can’t do it. How bout best US born Goalie likely in nhl history Connor Hellebuyck signed card. Extremely used.Throw in a slightly used Kyle Conner card and you have yourself a deal
Not enoughCan’t do it. How bout best US born Goalie likely in nhl history Connor Hellebuyck signed card. Extremely used.
No he isn't. If he shot an average forward shooting percentage of 11% he'd have scored 16 goals last season. Kind of like what he's on pace for this season. It's like the year Mangiapane shot 19% except much more unsustainable. Kuzmenko will never touch 30 again. He'll score 15 to 25.Wrong. He doesn’t fit Tocchett’s system. He’s still a 30+ goal scorer.
Kuzmenko has a high shooting percentage because he doesn’t shoot for volume. He’s a pure finisher that makes the right play and only shoots when it’s a high quality scoring chance. Tocchet just doesn’t like his back checking or defensive awareness. He’ll get 30 again.No he isn't. If he shot an average forward shooting percentage of 11% he'd have scored 16 goals last season. Kind of like what he's on pace for this season. It's like the year Mangiapane shot 19% except much more unsustainable. Kuzmenko will never touch 30 again. He'll score 15 to 25.
No he won't. He's shooting 12% this year and his numbers are in line with what I just stated. People said the same thing about Mangiapane and Brad Boyes. Boyes scored 43 one year shooting 21%. Kuzmenko shot over 27%. Elite shooters like Ovechkin, Matthews, Pastrnak, Laine ect shoot 13-14%. No one shoots 27%.Kuzmenko has a high shooting percentage because he doesn’t shoot for volume. He’s a pure finisher that makes the right play and only shoots when it’s a high quality scoring chance. Tocchet just doesn’t like his back checking or defensive awareness. He’ll get 30 again.
Kuzmenko has a high shooting percentage because he doesn’t shoot for volume. He’s a pure finisher that makes the right play and only shoots when it’s a high quality scoring chance. Tocchet just doesn’t like his back checking or defensive awareness. He’ll get 30 again.
Imo Kuzzy would be moved for a mid round pick if the Canucks have another trade lined up to bring in a guy like Lindholm. Then it’s pretty much Kuzzy for Lindholm. Just not straight across. Kuzzy goes to Bieser the cap to bring in Lindholm.
This is correct. Except elite shooters shoot 12-15%. Average shooters are like 9%.Ok, so he's the most accurate shooter in NHL history by a mile. We're also just going to ignore every case of players shooting 25-30% and then regressing back to 12-15% where every player falls to. Like what happened to him this season. Kuzy isn't some generational talent, he's just another in a long list of players who played hard for a contract and then regressed back to average
Yup. Imo a cap dump costs assets to unload. So Kuzzy isn’t a true cap dump (the Canucks will get back a mid round pick) but the purpose of moving him is to clear cap, that’s for sure.Yea, if the Canucks are making a move that brings in cap, they’re not keeping Kuzmenko anyway, so either he’d go in that deal or a separate dump
If someone offers anything they should do it instantly. Can't have that cap tied up in contender mode. My guess is they'll need to attach a 3rd to move him.Yup. Imo a cap dump costs assets to unload. So Kuzzy isn’t a true cap dump (the Canucks will get back a mid round pick) but the purpose of moving him is to clear cap, that’s for sure.
If CHicago has any brains (I am not sure if they do) you make Vancouver pay through the nose. They just want cap space to improve their team elsewhere.
1 dimensional "one year wonder" thus far who had an almost 30% shooting percentage last year and has sucked now and gets healthy scratched
If Kuzmenko was a couple years younger, I would like it for CHI more.The Hawks have 15 goals in the last 11 games and have been shutout 4 of the last 6
Hawks need NHL talent with offensive talent
And will need it next year as well
Prospects like Nazar, Moore, etc are a couple years away from NHL upfront
If someone offers anything they should do it instantly. Can't have that cap tied up in contender mode. My guess is they'll need to attach a 3rd to move him.
edit: supposedly he said if he were them, maybe not a big deal though we know the Canucks and Blackhawks have made this kind of deal in the past so there is precedent for it with the Beauvillier trade.
edit again: he confirmed it in a later interview, video in post #28
Sure, makes sense. I'm assuming though with all the smoke the Canucks are looking to make at least 1 addition. Likely 2.If they don’t make a move at the deadline though I’d rather keep him than give him away. If nothing else he gives options in the playoffs
He's a one dimensional winger on pace for 15 goals making $5.5M through 2025.
If this trade happens it should be Vancouver sending out picks not Chicago.
I've said this before but for one example this season aside Mark Scheifele averaged about 18% for a good 5 seasons, with a peak of 20.4. There's always someone in a season shooting above 20%, looking at this season Sam Reinhart is shooting 27.6%. And the elite shooters you're listing above are also volume shooters.No he won't. He's shooting 12% this year and his numbers are in line with what I just stated. People said the same thing about Mangiapane and Brad Boyes. Boyes scored 43 one year shooting 21%. Kuzmenko shot over 27%. Elite shooters like Ovechkin, Matthews, Pastrnak, Laine ect shoot 13-14%. No one shoots 27%.
Bullshit, You're completely ignoring his KHL production.No he isn't. If he shot an average forward shooting percentage of 11% he'd have scored 16 goals last season. Kind of like what he's on pace for this season. It's like the year Mangiapane shot 19% except much more unsustainable. Kuzmenko will never touch 30 again. He'll score 15 to 25.
It’s surprising how many people still don’t understand how important cap space is. If Vancouver has another deal lined up where they can utilize that $5.5M better, they’ll absolutely look at dumping Kuzmenko. That said, I can still see him fetching a 3rd or equivalent prospect in this case. Chicago desperately needs some talent to play alongside Bedard and despite his warts, Kuzmenko is probably among the better offensive forwards Chicago could hope to acquire in this sort of scenario.The back being scratched is $5.5 million in cap opening up.